Datapeople Reviews & Product Details

Datapeople makes it easy to edit job descriptions to attract more qualified and diverse talent. It flags areas in your job description that may be lacking that you normally wouldn't think of.

It takes a little while to understand the UI and layout. I had to go through two trainings to figure out how to best use the tool . Also, I can't find the "datapeople everywhere" integration that allows me to make edits directly in the SmartRecruiters API.

Datapeople makes my job descriptions standout. I've been able to attract a wider range of more qualified candidates to my jobs. It also takes out a lot of the effort associated with editing JDs.

I love how it catches things in the JD that I did not. Also, it promotes equity and takes things into consideration things that I may not.

Sometimes they flag the smallest things, like "self-sufficient" or "communication skills"

Being more inclusive

That I could edit everything and also I can add someone to the document

I actualy don't know what you could upgrade.

The most important thing is option to share job description with someone. We could work together !

the suggested amendments makes it easy to quickly get jobs much more inclusive without the hiring manager having to take too much effort or time

'one size fits all' approach. sometimes for some specific ads the wording can't be changed as suggested as it then wouldn't make sense

encouraging more diverse applicants with the inclusive wording

Datapeople has pushed us to review our wording. Putting more "you will" statements and including who they will report to has made an impact. We want to be as transparent as possible in our job descriptions and datapeople has helped us.

Scoring is confusing. We have one published post at 76 but it is very similar to the others we have posted. The feedback to the left is all good and there are no underlined red words within the body. Nothing stands out on how we could improve this score

Inclusive language and providing transparency to our candidates

the options to have the role more inclusive, more dynamic, more clear in tasks and requirements

there are some previous info that I cannot touch and it makes the JDs longer than expected.

In our case, to have JDs that are more inclusive instead of being only written for males.

Direct feedback to specific wording, making sure to use gender neutral wording, AI technology ensuring effective wording and comparison with other ads

At the moment it does not exist with german language/ for germany. Server location makint it challenging to use with GDP.

easy acess to templates, score and feedback helps explaining why this way of creating job ads makes sense/is most effecitve.

The tool is easy to use Easy to implement into our current company recruitment workflow process Some good suggestions Great customer success manager

Could do with some more wording suggestions as options to pick from Doesn't integrate with Workday

Making our job ads more inclusive and helping us find more diverse talent

It simply works, i was very happy using DataPeople. The UI works, the outcome was easy, the tutorial was also super seamless. Nothing much to say, i don't like to compare with competitors, just keep focusing on making sure your product is the right product and there is no need to look around.

Nothing so far, everything worked well. Overall the experience of the product is very seamless, so can't write anything that i disliked about the product. Feel free to reach out for more info.

Job Description and templating for publishing them into the internet, that way candidates can definitly engage faster into our roles and make sure they get the most out of their time.

We like the scoring Mechanics and suggestions.

Datapeople doesn't talk nicely to our HR system.

Cleaning Up Job Descriptions

Being able to fine-tune the language used

The lack of seamless integration with our ATS

Being more transparent and direct with our expectations

Real-time feedback instead of having to A/B test and guess where to improve. Having suggestions on what language to change is helpful.

Sometimes there are a couple of bugs, but the team are quick to resolve them or work through them with us. The thing I disliked most has been altered already - which was the inability to see your own JD with a recommended one side-by-side.

Ensuring we're doing what we can to reduce unconscious bias. It's also helpful for our candidates and employees to know that we're doing what we can at the point of entry to reduce bias and open the door to all types of candidates.

Provided word recommendations and useful tips

Sometimes it cuts too much description out

Creating a more inclusive candidate pool

The subsititute words provided and insight into readability by using better wording.

The job length range is pretty unreasonable for high level roles

- readability - DEIB

The Datapeople recommendations are tremendous as they help you build inclusive descriptions that bring in the right mixture of people to interview.

I find it challenging to find the job descriptions that I've created in the past.

It helps to create friendly job descriptions, which generally were intimidating and overwhelming in the past.

Feedback from the application while setting up the job description

To get 100% mark, the job description must be very simple and short, and the only way to do that is to omit relevant information. The balance between a short JD and an efficient JD should be tweaked.

Create compelling and inclusive JDs. Clear hiring process and good candidates that fit the role profile. Faster hiring process.

-It's straightforward to use. With some clicks, you can find what works and doesn't work publishing a job. - Integration with the ATS (lever) is quick and easy. - It gives really nice alternatives when wording job requirements.

- Sometimes, the suggestions that Datapeople provides don't fit into the context. - Some rare times, some words are flagged without apparent reason and much context.

Data people is helping me build better and more inclusive job postings. It helps identify the best wording so we can reach more people. It made me realize that there is always room for improvement when talking about inclusivity.

The suggestions are great. Of course, every candidate would want to know who they may report to.

I can get a bit distracted by the various colors.

Job descriptions can quickly get lengthy, especially when it comes to describing the ideal candidate. Datapeople has allowed me to ensure that the most relevant content is presented and that it looks good on a mobile device.

The ease of being able to make changes to jobs.

This is less of what I dislike and more of what would be nice to have. It would be nice to be able to offer words/phrases to help begin a new order.

Making roles more inclusive has been great, giving examples of optional words to help with that.

Inclusivity, the performance of job overall.

It's missing if the job is too feminine or masculine and if the ad will perform based on location.

None