Datapeople Reviews & Product Details

They’re total rockstars in the data analytics and inclusive hiring world! The insights we’ve gotten from DataPeople have been a game changer for our business growth. Using their suggestions to improve job postings feels like a fun game. Big thumbs up from me!

Once you have a strong score, but not 100, there are no more suggestions on how to get a higher score.

Contribute to the ongoing journey toward a more inclusive workplace.

I love how easily it integrates into our ATS and the overall ease of use. It makes it borderline impossible to not have the most inclusive, concise, and all-around impactful job posting.

I wish it was a bit easier to tailor it to industries. ex: we use "Senior Associate" as a job title often, but get dinged in DP for having a title that is too senior for the required years of experience. I would love to be able to tailor it more for the advertising industry and the most commonly used titles!

DataPeople is reaching every area of the market that may be initially not interested in our job postings had we not used inclusive language and attracted talent with the concise description of the role and requirements.

I like using the Datapeople app as it helps me write a more noticeable job description. One that doesn't have unnecessary information, isn't too long and will make sure it reaches the correct target audience.

There are no dislikes about Datapeople at this time.

Taking all of the non-necessary wording out of previously used job descriptions and making it more to he point.

Easy to use Integrates with CRM well Helpful prompts Great insights

Nothing ! The system is really simply to use

Ensuring that my job ads are viewed and reviewed by the widest audience possible

I am really enjoying the tool, the job descriptions are much more consistent and refined. I am very happy that we have access to this amazing tool. It is very easy to use and produces a fantastic end product that I am very proud of as a Recruiter. Jen Angel has been great with training and support as well!

Once I got past the learning curve, which was short, I can truthfully say that there is nothing that I do not like about Datapeople and the tool. If I could think of something that I dislike I would gladly share but I truly enjoy using this tool.

I feel that the job descriptions are much clearer and it makes them more consistent across our organization. I am a fan of the tool and happy that we have the ability to use it!

- is easy to use it - comes with many recommendations - after you learn to use it, it takes 3-7 minutes to write a good job description - offers a standard guideline - comes with very ideas in how to improve your JD

- it still has some bugs - it does not calculate the overall score correctly all the time - it does not recognise all the time ex: for a Business Systems Analyst role, I wrote in the main requirements ,, At least 5 years of working experience in Business Systems Analyst -> in the score that is calculated, the platform still recommends to mention the experience that is required for this role; some times is doing the same with #LI-Hybrid and Benefits

- writing job description - idefying gramatical errors - saving time - being more creative - being more close to the candidates

Suggested polite words to use that encourage the candidate to apply and corrections of errors. It allowed me to take attention to details

Nothing really but always something which need to meet the standards some people dislike

It is easier now with direct guidance from data People. easier to publish

I value the inclusion of alternative phrasing for terms to enhance their relevance to potential applicants. For instance, specifying "excel (pivot tables and VLookups)" rather than just "excel" provides clearer insight into the Excel skills expected for the role. Moreover, the feature that highlights inclusive language in green is appreciated, as it serves as a positive reminder of the favorable aspects within the job posting.

Rather than proposing the complete removal of unnecessary terms, like "strong organizational skills" or "ability to work in fast-paced environments," it would be beneficial if the suggestions included alternative options or sentence restructuring to maintain the intended meaning. This would help prevent instances where changes to wording disrupt the sentence's coherence. The length of the job description should not include the company description and legal language in the evaluation of its length. These portions should remain unmodifiable. It would be helpful if job titles were exempt from evaluations. Users could have the option to indicate that a job title is not adjustable, thereby preventing any negative impact on their score.

I appreciate the Chrome plug-in for SmartRecruiters, allowing convenient updates without navigating to another site. It also enables us to enhance job descriptions inclusivity and eliminate biases that might deter qualified candidates.

the suggestions and the criteria suggested for each JD

not being available in other languages such as German, French

suggesting improvements for the JDs, making them more accesible, gender neutral and clearer

Very useful in creating accurate JD and gives the needed suggestions to improvise the JD.

It would be better if not all the columns are unlocked.

rectifying the mistakes in JD and including diversity.