Feedvisor360 Reviews — Pricing, Features & The Honest Take

Feedvisor sells pricing optimisation and publishes no price of its own. There is no pricing page on feedvisor.com — the two links labelled “pricing” both point at dynamic pricing, the product feature. What we did find is more useful than a rate card: the Terms and Conditions define the entire fee structure, and it is three parts — a fixed Base Fee, a Monthly Variable Fee charged as “a percentage of the Aggregate Managed Sales and/or the Monthly Media Spend”, and a Services Fee for consulting. Read that middle clause twice. The platform that sets your ad bids can be paid a percentage of what it spends.

• What it is: An AI platform for Amazon and Walmart sellers combining repricing, advertising optimisation and market intelligence.
• Best for: Established brands and large sellers with enough GMV to justify enterprise pricing and an annual contract.
• Pricing: Not published. Base Fee + a percentage of managed sales and/or ad spend + consulting. Verified August 2026.
• The honest catch: Refund credits only reduce your fee if you file them by the 8th of the following month.

What Is Feedvisor360?

First, a naming correction the Findstack listing has not caught up with: feedvisor.com/feedvisor-360/ now redirects to /agentis/. The platform has been rebranded Agentis™ by Feedvisor, and “Feedvisor360” is the previous generation’s name.

Agentis is built on three pillars — Advertising, Pricing and Intelligence — with the pitch that they run off one decision engine rather than three tools:

• Advertising: Sponsored Products, DSP and Amazon Marketing Cloud, with keyword discovery, search-trend analysis, placement-based bidding, dayparting and dynamic bid multipliers.
• Pricing: algorithmic repricing via what Feedvisor calls ProductSphere™, mapping competitors and adapting strategy to a stated business objective.
• Intelligence: competitor tracking across pricing, promotions, rank, reviews, units sold, advertising position and Buy Box share.

The differentiator Feedvisor claims is the input, not the output: “the only platform where ad decisions start with your margin, not your ROAS.” Their comparison table puts contribution margin and unit economics as primary targets where they say rivals optimise TACoS or ROAS alone.

The Terms name the supported channels more broadly than the marketing does: Amazon, Walmart, eBay and Shopify webstores, though the advertising side is explicitly Amazon and Walmart.

Headline claims on the site: ~40% TACoS improvement, 10%+ average margin expansion, $8B+ GMV optimised. These are vendor figures with no published methodology.

The Findstack listing carries no user reviews, so there is no independent signal on this listing.

How Feedvisor Pricing Works

The page above is the whole commercial surface: three statistics and a lead form. There is no plan, no tier, no “starting at”, and no pricing page anywhere on the site. Every route ends at Request a Live Demo.

That is a normal choice for enterprise software. It is a slightly awkward one for a company whose product exists to help you set prices, and it means the only primary source on cost is the contract.

Feedvisor Pricing

The fee model is in the terms and conditions

Section 6 of the Terms and Conditions sets out three fee components, all specified per-customer in an Order Form:

The terms also note that “the Fees are charged based on Services purchased and not on actual usage” — so the Base Fee is not metered down if you use less.

Credit where it is due: this is a far more precise disclosure than most enterprise vendors offer. Plenty of companies with a demo-only funnel say nothing at all about how they charge. Feedvisor defines each term well enough that you can walk into the negotiation knowing which levers exist. The percentages themselves are the only thing missing.

The variable fee can be a cut of your ad spend

“Monthly Media Spend” is defined as “the amount you spend each month on advertising on Amazon and Walmart calculated on a ‘cost per click’ basis.”

If your Order Form prices the Monthly Variable Fee against media spend, then the system deciding your bids is paid more when it bids more. Feedvisor’s own positioning argues against reading too much into this — the platform’s stated target is margin and TACoS rather than ROAS or spend, and a tool optimising for contribution margin has an incentive to spend less, not more. Both things are true at once, and the resolution is contractual rather than philosophical: ask which base your variable fee is calculated on, and push for managed sales rather than media spend if you have the leverage.

This is the single most important question to raise in the demo, and you will not find it discussed anywhere on the marketing site.

Refunds only reduce your bill if you file them by the 8th

“Aggregate Managed Sales” is the total your customers pay for products where the Service is switched on — for example, where the Reprice option is enabled — across every account and channel, less return credits and refunds.

But that deduction is conditional: refunds count “provided that such return credits and refunds are submitted to Feedvisor by you by no later than the 8th day of the successive calendar month (the ‘Cut-off Date’). Feedvisor reserves its right to bring forward the Cut-off Date by up to 2 days.”

Miss it and you pay the percentage on revenue that was returned. The chart shows how much that inflates the amount your fee is charged on:

For a low-return category this is a rounding error. For apparel, footwear or anything with 20–30% returns, filing refund records on time is worth a quarter to nearly half of your variable fee. And the deadline is not fixed — Feedvisor can move it forward by two days, which in a bad month means the 6th.

Whoever owns your monthly close needs this in their calendar, because nothing about the product will remind you.

Seven days to dispute, and then never

The invoicing clause gives you “a period of seven (7) days from the date of the invoice (the ‘Dispute Period’) to dispute the Monthly Variable Fee”, supported by written records. Feedvisor considers it “in its sole discretion”.

And then it closes permanently: “no dispute arising or relating to the Monthly Variable Fees may be raised following the applicable Dispute Period.”

Seven days is a tight window to audit a percentage-of-sales invoice against your own marketplace settlement data, particularly across multiple accounts and channels. Disputing also does not pause the rest of the bill — you still settle the undisputed portion on time.

Auto-renewal needs 30 days’ notice

Subscriptions “automatically renew for additional period(s) of equivalent duration” unless either party gives written notice at least thirty (30) days before expiry. On a twelve-month Order Form, missing that window by a day commits you to another twelve months.

On termination the terms are blunt: “you will lose all access to the Service, to your Account(s), and to any Data that we may be storing on your behalf. It is your responsibility to download your Data prior to canceling.” Export before you leave, not after.

Two clauses that favour you, and one that might not

Worth reading the whole contract, because parts of it are genuinely customer-friendly:

• If Feedvisor materially reduces the value of the Service — “e.g., by removing specific functionality without replacing it with substantially similar or improved functionality” — you may terminate. That is an unusual and welcome protection.
• If your marketplace account is suspended for more than seven days, your Feedvisor account is suspended on written notice and “the Term shall be automatically extended by the period during which your Account was suspended.” You do not pay for time you cannot use.
• Less welcome: if you “identify/monitor 100,000 (one hundred thousand) or more” SKUs, Feedvisor “reserves the right, at its discretion, not to provide you with the Service, to offer you with limited services/Plans or to apply additional charges.” Large-catalogue sellers should establish where they sit before investing in an evaluation.

A free trial is also referenced in the terms, though nothing on the current site advertises one — worth asking about.

What third parties report, and why we are not repeating it as fact

Independent review sites currently report figures in the region of $100/month for a cut-down “Essentials” product and $1,500–$3,000+/month for the full platform on an annual contract, sometimes alongside a 1% revenue share.

We could not verify any of that against Feedvisor’s own materials, which publish no prices at all, and the product has since been rebranded to Agentis — so tier names in older reviews may no longer exist. Treat those numbers as a rough order of magnitude for whether to book the demo, not as a quote.

What actually decides your cost

• Which base your Monthly Variable Fee is struck against — managed sales, media spend, or both.
• How much revenue has repricing switched on, since only managed products count.
• Your return rate, and whether refunds are filed by the 8th.
• Your monthly Amazon and Walmart ad spend, if media spend is in the calculation.
• Consulting and managed services, billed hourly or per project on top.
• Catalogue size, with a 100,000-SKU threshold that can trigger surcharges or refusal.
• Contract length, since renewal is automatic in equivalent periods.

Who Should Use Feedvisor

Feedvisor fits an established Amazon or Walmart brand large enough that a percentage of GMV is a rational way to buy software — where a one or two point improvement in margin comfortably exceeds a five-figure annual commitment. The argument for the platform is real: repricing and advertising genuinely do interact, and running them in separate tools means each optimises without seeing the other.

It fits particularly well for sellers whose bottleneck is analyst time rather than tooling, given the Consulting and Managed Services options — outsourcing the operation is part of the offer, not an afterthought.

It fits badly for small and mid-size sellers. With no published entry price, a demo-only funnel and an annual contract, the evaluation cost alone is significant, and a percentage-of-sales model is at its least attractive when sales are modest.

It also fits badly for very large catalogues, where the 100,000-SKU clause may mean limited plans or surcharges, and for high-return categories unless you are confident of hitting the refund cut-off every month.

Honest Pros and Cons

What works well:

• The fee structure is defined precisely in the terms — Base Fee, Monthly Variable Fee, Services Fee, each with a stated basis. Many demo-only vendors disclose nothing.
• “Aggregate Managed Sales” is defined net of returns, so the model does contemplate refunds rather than charging on gross by default.
• Only products with the Service switched on count toward managed sales — you are not billed on your whole catalogue.
• A material-reduction clause lets you terminate if Feedvisor removes functionality without replacing it.
• The Term extends automatically if your marketplace account is suspended for more than seven days.
• You can terminate if a supported channel is permanently removed.
• Genuine platform breadth: Sponsored Products, DSP, AMC, repricing, competitor and Buy Box intelligence in one system.
• Margin and unit economics as the stated optimisation target, rather than ROAS.
• Consulting and managed services are available, which suits teams short on analysts.
• A free trial is referenced in the terms — worth asking for.

What to watch:

• No published pricing anywhere on the site — the only “pricing” links refer to the dynamic-pricing product.
• The Monthly Variable Fee can be a percentage of your ad spend, meaning the bidder can be paid on what it bids.
• Refund credits only reduce the fee if filed by the 8th of the following month.
• Feedvisor may bring that cut-off forward by up to two days.
• Seven days to dispute a variable-fee invoice, after which no dispute may be raised at all.
• Automatic renewal for an equivalent term unless you give 30 days’ written notice.
• All access and stored data are lost on termination — export first.
• 100,000+ SKUs may mean refusal, limited plans or surcharges.
• Base fees are charged on services purchased, not actual usage.
• The listing name is stale — Feedvisor360 now redirects to Agentis.
• Headline claims (~40% TACoS, 10%+ margin) carry no published methodology.
• No Findstack user reviews.

Feedvisor Alternatives and How It Compares

• Jungle Scout sits at the opposite end — published, self-serve pricing aimed at smaller sellers, with research and analytics rather than enterprise repricing and DSP management.
• Helium 10 is the other well-known self-serve suite and the obvious first stop for anyone who wants to know the price before booking a call.
• Teikametrics and Perpetua are the closest direct competitors on the advertising side, both also enterprise-oriented but generally more forthcoming about entry pricing.
• Pacvue competes hardest at the large-brand and agency end, particularly for DSP and retail-media management across multiple retailers.
• Informed.co and RepricerExpress cover repricing alone at published, modest prices — the right comparison if pricing automation is all you need and you do not want an advertising platform attached.

Only Jungle Scout currently has a Findstack listing among these, so the rest are named without links, and we have not re-verified their pricing here.

The honest framing: Feedvisor is competing on the integration of pricing and advertising, which is a real technical argument. What it is not competing on is transparency — several rivals will tell you what they cost before you speak to anyone.

The Verdict

Agentis is a serious enterprise platform with a coherent thesis: your repricer and your ad manager are making decisions that affect each other, and running them separately leaves margin on the table. For a large Amazon or Walmart brand, that argument is worth hearing.

What you cannot do is evaluate the cost without a sales conversation, because Feedvisor publishes nothing. The compensation — and it is a real one — is that the Terms and Conditions are unusually specific about the shape of the deal. You know before the call that you will be quoted a fixed Base Fee, a percentage-based Monthly Variable Fee, and hourly or project consulting. That is more than most demo-gated vendors give you, and it means you can arrive with the right questions.

Ask three of them. First: is my variable fee struck against managed sales, media spend, or both? A percentage of ad spend puts the bidder on the same side of the ledger as the spending, and while Feedvisor’s margin-first positioning cuts against that reading, the answer belongs in the contract rather than the pitch. Second: what is the refund cut-off in my Order Form? At a 20% return rate, missing the 8th inflates the base of your fee by a quarter, and Feedvisor can pull that date forward by two days. Third: what happens at renewal? Thirty days’ written notice, or you have bought another full term.

So: treat this as an enterprise procurement, not a software purchase. If your GMV is large enough that a point of margin dwarfs a five-figure commitment, the platform is credible and the integration argument is genuine. If you are small enough to be shopping on price, the absence of one is your answer — several competitors will quote you today.

FAQ

How much does Feedvisor cost?

Feedvisor does not publish any prices. There is no pricing page on feedvisor.com, and the two navigation links labelled “pricing” both point to Dynamic Pricing, the product feature. Every route ends at a demo request form. What the Terms and Conditions do disclose is the structure: a fixed Base Fee, a Monthly Variable Fee calculated as “a percentage of the Aggregate Managed Sales and/or the Monthly Media Spend”, and a Services Fee for consulting at hourly or fixed project rates — all set per customer in an Order Form. Third-party review sites report figures around $1,500–$3,000+/month for the full platform, but we could not verify those and the product has since been rebranded.

Is Feedvisor360 the same as Agentis?

Yes. feedvisor.com/feedvisor-360/ redirects to /agentis/, and the platform is now marketed as Agentis™ by Feedvisor. Findstack’s listing still carries the older name. The three pillars are advertising (Sponsored Products, DSP and Amazon Marketing Cloud), dynamic pricing via ProductSphere™, and competitive intelligence covering rank, reviews, units sold, ad position and Buy Box share. Older reviews referring to “Feedvisor 360” or “Feedvisor Essentials” tiers may describe plans that no longer exist under those names.

Does Feedvisor charge a percentage of sales?

It can, and it can also charge a percentage of your advertising spend. The Terms define the Monthly Variable Fee as a percentage of Aggregate Managed Sales — the total your customers pay for products where the Service is switched on, less qualifying returns — and/or Monthly Media Spend, defined as your monthly Amazon and Walmart cost-per-click advertising. Which basis applies to you is set in your Order Form. Establish this before signing, since a fee calculated on ad spend means the platform managing your bids is paid on what it spends.

What is Feedvisor’s refund cut-off date?

Return credits and refunds only reduce your Aggregate Managed Sales if they are “submitted to Feedvisor by you by no later than the 8th day of the successive calendar month” — and Feedvisor reserves the right to bring that date forward by up to two days. Miss it and your variable fee is charged on revenue that was returned. At a 10% return rate that inflates the fee base by 11.1%; at 20% by 25%; at 30% by nearly 43%. There is also a separate, hard seven-day window from the invoice date to dispute a variable-fee charge, after which no dispute may be raised.

Does Feedvisor auto-renew?

Yes. Each subscription “shall automatically renew for additional period(s) of equivalent duration” unless either party gives written notice at least thirty days before the current term expires. On a twelve-month Order Form that means a twelve-month renewal. On termination or expiry you “will lose all access to the Service, to your Account(s), and to any Data” Feedvisor holds, and exporting your data beforehand is explicitly your responsibility. Two clauses run the other way: you may terminate if Feedvisor materially reduces the value of the Service, and your Term is automatically extended if your marketplace account is suspended for more than seven days.