Strikingly vs HubSpot CMS Hub
Take a look at how Strikingly and HubSpot CMS Hub stack up against each other across pricing, features, and support using feedback from real users like yourself. Strikingly scores 4.0 out of 5 from 39 reviews, while HubSpot CMS Hub has been rated 4.5 out of 5 from 1563 reviews.
Findstack offers objective and comprehensive comparisons to help you find the best software. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links. Learn more
Start selling digital products with Crevio
5.0
(1)
$29.00/month
Crevio is a platform for creators to sell digital products, services, courses and access to other 3rd-...
Learn more about Crevio
At a Glance
Overview
Strikingly specializes in single-page layouts, which makes it the best choice for landing pages and other online forms designed for lead capture. Strikingly’s templates are all designed to look amazing on any device and let users build pages in just minutes, without the need for coding. Strikingl... Learn more
Capabilities
- AI Enabled
- API Available
- Open Source
- CLI Available
Images
View 4 images
Hubspot CMS Hub is a content management platform that makes website management simple and accessible so users can focus on managing their audience and customers with ease. It lets users create and manage website pages with personalized features. The platform is also optimized for various devices ... Learn more
Capabilities
- AI Enabled
- API Available
- Open Source
- CLI Available
Images
View 4 images
Exclusive Deals
Discover Amazing Software Deals on Findstack
Get access to up to $600,000+ in savings on the best software to scale your business.
Pricing
Free trial available
Free plan available
Billing type
Recurring Subscription
Limited
$12.00
/ month
Pro
$20.00
/ month
VIP
$59.00
/ month
Free trial available
Free plan available
Billing type
Recurring Subscription
Starter
$25.00
/ month
Starter CRM Suite
$50.00
/ month
Professional
$400.00
/ month
Enterprise
$1200.00
/ month
Pros and Cons
- Fantastic customer support
- Plans support multiple websites
- User-friendly interface
- Not a lot to offer for SEO
- The free version is very limited
- There’s a cap on how many products you could sell per plan
- Lets users keep all their marketing data in one centralized place
- Extensive integration partners
- Access to Hubspot Academy
- Platform easily scales to your needs
- More expensive than alternative options
- Limited customizablility and configurations
Reviewer's Segments
Small Business
84.62%
Mid Market
7.69%
Enterprise
7.69%
Small Business
55.09%
Mid Market
39.99%
Enterprise
4.93%
Deployment
- Cloud based
- Desktop based
- Mobile based
- On-premise
- Cloud based
- Desktop based
- Mobile based
- On-premise
Support
- Email/Help Desk
- FAQs/Forum
- Knowledge Base
- Phone Support
- 24/7 (Live rep)
- Chat
- Email/Help Desk
- FAQs/Forum
- Knowledge Base
- Phone Support
- 24/7 (Live rep)
- Chat
Training
- In Person
- Live Online
- Webinars
- Documentation
- Videos
- In Person
- Live Online
- Webinars
- Documentation
- Videos
Integrations
Total integrations:
22
- Acuity Scheduling
- Aircall
- Alibaba Cloud Object Storage Service (OSS)
- Alipay
- Avast For Home
- Bitly
- Calendly
- Databox
- Demio
- Disqus
- Dropbox
- Elastic Enterprise Search (Swiftype) Formerly Swiftype
- Eventbrite
- Google Analytics
- Google Drive
- Namecheap Website Builder
- OneDrive
- Plausible Analytics
- Stripe
- Typeform
- UserWay
- Vimeo
- Wistia
- Wufoo
- Zerys
Total integrations:
7
- Acuity Scheduling
- Aircall
- Alibaba Cloud Object Storage Service (OSS)
- Alipay
- Avast For Home
- Bitly
- Calendly
- Databox
- Demio
- Disqus
- Dropbox
- Elastic Enterprise Search (Swiftype) Formerly Swiftype
- Eventbrite
- Google Analytics
- Google Drive
- Namecheap Website Builder
- OneDrive
- Plausible Analytics
- Stripe
- Typeform
- UserWay
- Vimeo
- Wistia
- Wufoo
- Zerys
Top Alternatives
Categories
Common categories include: Website Builder Software.
Company Details
- By Strikingly, Inc.
- Located in Shanghai, China
- Founded in 2012
- By HubSpot
- Located in Cambridge, MA
- Founded in 2006
Popular Comparisons
