Bitbucket Reviews & Product Details

The code review with the existing and pld code made it ease to see the changes made The user friendly UI made easy to track all the pull requests branches and commits without confusion. The different views, Integration with IDEs,bit bucket pipeline made it more than just a code management tool

The UI could have been little more easy to use as some of the options are not was ultimately explorable and hidden under menus which can be made more accessible.

Code management Version control Track changes Track progress Track commits and releases Fix any issues directly on the bitbucket The code management has been made extremely improved after bitbucket

I Find handy the conde insights feature and integrations with trello and Jira, since we already use those tools on our project management.

Nothing much to dislike regarding functionality, a point would be the layout of the whole system, but that is just aesthetics.

Code reviews are much easier, and being able to do proper version management instead of just adding a bunch of version numbers on my codes makes complete difference on my daily work.

Excellent UI and easy to use.great features same as github..Faster loading and service.Best thing is its available for free so anyone can store their codes, colloborate with other developers and share their repositories

Like every functionality and feature.Completely satisfied no issues whatso ever

Saving and storing sql codes and sharing with multiple ppl in need.Colloborating on projects with other team members and across departments

search inside repos for code are an easy way to find problematic or faulty code that you want removed. the code pipelines are a great and affordable tool to automate testing and deployment.

mixed up login credentials and role management from atlassian and bitbucket. sometimes we can configure roles and access directly on repo, sometimes it has to be done in settings. would be nice to have it all be done on both screens or a link between them

version control, testing code before deployment, third party coding collaboration, alerts and notifications upon commits and deployments. we have better control of our code because it gets notified to developers.

I liked the branching and merging functionality the best. As I work in a big team, managing code is the biggest challenge, and bitbucket makes life easier when it comes to managing codes.

The naming convention is one field where bitbucket can work more. There are specific naming conventions we need to follow. But everything else looks good to me.

We are managing the whole source code from Bitbucket. We have a big team, and team members are from different places, so whenever there is a new change, we push the code to the specific branch, and then everyone takes the latest change.

Pull Request Review, Request Changes, Users Permissions for Merging, Availability. I use for my main project in the company, managing hundreds of branch and release or bugfix easily.

Sometimes when creating PR is taking a long time.

developing a website program, releasing to production, bug fixing, and managing multi-version of product in the same git with various branches and permissions for product line.

The interface is nice that helps teams collaborate. It has all the authentication features that is must have in team of multiple members so that some tickets could be restricted from some user.

Its a complex tool with all the features.So for a newbie this software have to be learned to move ahead. I have seen in my team that new joinees get stuck initially.

This tool helps us to arrange the work that we have to keep in backlog. It efficiently aligns with agile methodology and helps to create sprints. It give board to user to set their items in different states such as todo, inprogress,totest etc. These states could easily be managed by admin

Just like any other Atlassian platform, the user interfaces and experiences are top-notch, beginner-friendly and eye-catching. It's also easy to integrate with other ancillary software.

There are limited authentication options and considering how difficult it can be at times to configure an ssh authentication, it seems to be a really big gripe for a lot of its users.

Source control is a big part of the software development process. With bitbucket, the code base is secured at all times. Just commit and push it and you're good :)

As Bitbucket is owned by Atlassian, the overall UI and clarifications are listed for a reviewer or a developer, regarding details of the branch. This helps the user navigate across the interface

Bitbucket has an issue with those who start new and the biggest flaw observed is that only a limited user receives access over an account to monitor deploy and review

The main focus was to create sub branches from the main branch to reduce the development activity among other developers during code merge. This helped in the time estimation before delivery.

I make the merge the changes over there and also I can check the changes that i have pushed

Everything was fine and i can't find any issues

Making merge with other branches and also check the conflicts and also make branch difference of source code