Unclaimed: Are you working at Make?
Make Reviews: 4.7/5 — Highly Rated
Make is an iPaaS software that lets you build as if you were a developer, with minimal coding knowledge. With Make, users can create as many workflows as needed and integrate an infinite number of apps in a single workflow. It also includes advanced features like iterations, aggregations, conditional logic, filtering, error handling, execution history log, and more.
| Capabilities |
API
|
|---|---|
| Segment |
Small Business
Mid Market
Enterprise
|
| Deployment | Cloud / SaaS / Web-Based |
| Support | 24/7 (Live rep), Chat, Email/Help Desk, FAQs/Forum, Knowledge Base, Phone Support |
| Training | Documentation |
| Languages | English |
Make gives you 5 GB of monthly data transfer on its $9 Core plan. On the $16 Pro plan it is 5 GB. On the $29 Teams plan it is 5 GB. On Enterprise it is 5 GB. Maximum file size climbs steadily across those tiers — 100 MB, 250 MB, 500 MB, 1000 MB — which reads as though throughput is scaling with price. It is not. If your automations move a lot of data rather than a few large files, the cheapest paid plan gives you exactly as much room as the most expensive one.
- What it is: A visual, no-code automation platform in the iPaaS category, connecting 3,000-plus apps.
- Best for: Teams building multi-step workflows visually rather than writing integration code.
- Pricing: Free; Core $9, Pro $16, Teams $29 per month at 10,000 credits; Enterprise quoted. Verified July 2026.
- The honest catch: The free plan enforces a 15-minute minimum interval between runs.
What Is Make?
Make — formerly Integromat — is a visual automation platform. You build scenarios by dragging modules onto a canvas and wiring them together, with routers, filters, and error handling, across more than 3,000 connected apps. It is the more visual and more powerful end of the no-code automation market, sitting between Zapier’s simplicity and a developer-grade integration platform.
The meter is credits. Make’s own FAQ defines them plainly: “Every time a module in a scenario performs an action, it consumes credits. For example, when your scenario reads a record from Pipedrive, writes a row into a Google Sheet, or posts a tweet, each counts as one credit.” Most actions cost one, but the page notes that “some advanced features leveraging Make’s AI Provider may use more” — so AI-heavy scenarios burn the allowance faster than the count of steps suggests.
All three published plans start at the 10,000-credit level and scale upward through a selector running 20k, 40k, 80k, 150k, 300k, 500k, 750k, 1M and beyond, to 8M and above.
How Make Works
- Credits are the primary meter, from 1,000 free to 8M-plus.
- Prices quoted are at 10,000 credits — the selector raises them from there.
- Data transfer is flat at 5 GB on every paid tier.
- The free plan throttles frequency, not just volume.
- Annual billing saves “15% or more.”
- AI actions can consume more than one credit each.
Make Pricing
Captured from Make’s pricing page in July 2026 in US dollars, at the 10,000-credit level.
| Plan | Monthly | Credits | Data transfer | Max file | Logs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 1,000/mo | 512 MB | 5 MB | 7 days |
| Core | $9 | 10,000+ | 5 GB | 100 MB | 30 days |
| Pro | $16 | 10,000+ | 5 GB | 250 MB | 30 days |
| Teams | $29 | 10,000+ | 5 GB | 500 MB | 30 days |
| Enterprise | Quoted | Custom | 5 GB | 1000 MB | 60 days |
What actually decides your plan:
- Data transfer does not scale with price. Every paid tier from $9 to Enterprise allows 5 GB a month. What does scale is the maximum size of a single file — 100 MB, 250 MB, 500 MB, 1000 MB. Those are different constraints, and only one of them is a throughput limit. A workflow syncing thousands of small records hits the same ceiling on Teams as on Core.
- The free plan’s real limit is the clock, not the credits. A 15-minute minimum interval between runs means nothing on the free tier can respond promptly to anything. Combined with two active scenarios, it is a demonstration environment rather than a working one. Per-minute scheduling is the single biggest thing $9 buys.
- Core at $9 is a genuinely complete plan. Unlimited active scenarios, scheduling down to the minute, API access, 100 MB files, and 30-day logs. Most of what people upgrade for is not capacity but collaboration.
- Pro buys speed and searchability. Priority scenario execution, custom variables, and full-text execution log search for $7 more. If you are debugging complex scenarios regularly, full-text log search alone can justify it; if you are not, it will not.
- Teams is a per-organisation feature, not a per-seat one. Team roles and shared scenario templates at $29 is the plan for more than one builder. Note that it does not raise your data transfer or your log retention.
- Credits are what you actually budget. The published $9, $16, and $29 are the entry configuration at 10,000 credits. Model your monthly action count first, then read the price at that step, because the selector is what moves the bill.
Who Should Use Make
- Teams building genuinely complex workflows. The clearest case — routers, filters, and error handling make Make substantially more capable than simpler tools.
- Anyone automating across many apps. More than 3,000 integrations, with a visual canvas that keeps multi-branch logic legible.
- Budget-conscious automators. At $9 for unlimited scenarios and per-minute scheduling, Core undercuts most of the category.
- Operations teams standardising a process. Shared templates and team roles on the $29 Teams plan.
It fits poorly for high-volume data movement, where the flat 5 GB ceiling applies at every price; for teams wanting the simplest possible tool, where the visual canvas is more than they need; and for organisations requiring self-hosting, which Make does not offer.
Honest Pros and Cons
Strengths
- $9 for unlimited active scenarios and per-minute scheduling.
- 3,000-plus app integrations on every tier including free.
- A genuinely powerful visual builder with routers, filters, and branching.
- A permanent free plan with no time limit.
- A clear, published definition of what a credit is.
- Annual billing saves 15% or more.
Limitations
- Data transfer is 5 GB on every paid plan, from $9 to Enterprise.
- The free plan enforces a 15-minute minimum interval.
- Only two active scenarios on free.
- Log retention stays at 30 days through Teams.
- AI-powered actions consume more than one credit each.
- The published prices describe only the 10,000-credit step.
Make Alternatives and How It Compares
- n8n is the closest technical competitor and can be self-hosted, which Make cannot.
- Zapier is simpler and better known, with a larger app catalogue and higher prices.
- Workato and Tray.ai target enterprise integration with quoted pricing.
- Pabbly Connect and Activepieces compete at the budget end.
- Power Automate is the natural choice inside a Microsoft estate.
For a broader survey, browse our iPaaS directory.
The Verdict
Make is the best-value serious automation platform in this category, and the reason is Core. At $9 a month you get unlimited active scenarios, scheduling down to the minute, API access, and the full visual builder with routers, filters, and branching. Competitors charge multiples of that for less capability, and the free plan — permanent, with 1,000 credits and 3,000-plus integrations — is a real way to evaluate it rather than a countdown.
One number does not do what its neighbours imply. The monthly data transfer allowance is 5 GB on Core, 5 GB on Pro, 5 GB on Teams, and 5 GB on Enterprise. Sitting right beside it, maximum file size climbs from 100 MB to 1000 MB across the same tiers, which makes the whole block read like a capacity ladder. It is not one. Single-file size and total monthly throughput are different limits, and only the first improves as you pay. If your scenarios move large volumes of small records — a nightly sync, a high-traffic webhook, a data warehouse feed — upgrading from Core to Teams buys you collaboration features and precisely no additional headroom.
Two smaller things worth pricing in. The free plan’s binding constraint is the 15-minute minimum interval between runs, not the credit allowance — nothing on it can react promptly, which makes it unsuitable for anything user-facing regardless of volume. And the published $9, $16, and $29 describe the 10,000-credit configuration only; the selector runs to eight million and beyond, so estimate your monthly action count before treating any of those figures as your price. Make deserves credit for defining a credit unambiguously in its own FAQ, which is more than several competitors manage.
FAQ
How much does Make cost?
Captured in July 2026 in US dollars at the 10,000-credit level: Free at $0 with up to 1,000 credits a month, Core at $9, Pro at $16, and Teams at $29 per month, with Enterprise quoted. All paid plans use a credit selector running from 10,000 up past eight million, and the price rises with it. Annual billing saves “15% or more” according to the page.
What is a credit in Make?
An action performed by a module. Make’s FAQ states: “Every time a module in a scenario performs an action, it consumes credits. For example, when your scenario reads a record from Pipedrive, writes a row into a Google Sheet, or posts a tweet, each counts as one credit.” Most actions cost one credit, but the page notes that some advanced features using Make’s AI Provider consume more.
Does a more expensive Make plan give more data transfer?
No. The monthly data transfer allowance is 512 MB on Free and then a flat 5 GB on Core, Pro, Teams, and Enterprise alike. What does increase across those tiers is the maximum size of an individual file — 100 MB, 250 MB, 500 MB, and 1000 MB respectively. Those are separate limits, and only the file-size one scales with price.
What are the limits on Make’s free plan?
Up to 1,000 credits per month, a maximum of two active scenarios, a 15-minute minimum interval between runs, 512 MB of data transfer, 5 MB maximum file size, and 7 days of execution log storage. It has no time limit. In practice the 15-minute interval is the constraint that matters most, since it rules out anything that needs to respond promptly.
Make or n8n?
Both are powerful visual automation tools at similar price points, and the deciding factor is usually hosting. n8n can be self-hosted, which matters for teams with data residency or compliance requirements, and it appeals more to technical users. Make is fully managed, has a more polished builder, and a larger catalogue of ready-made integrations. Choose n8n for control, Make for convenience.
Compare Make with other popular tools in the same category.
Very intuitive software! Linking systems and data together is now so easy and fun. Im a huge fan of the drag-and-drop structures. Overall, it has a wide array of tools to connect online accounts and systems that prior to Integromat wouldnt normally communicate well with each other (if at all)!
Support for the software is declining, takes days to get help/response.
connecting social media, managing projects and bank accounts
Great UI and great functionality, lots of integrations to tap into.
Missing a few integrations with platforms I regularly use
Automation was the primary purpose for using integromat. To automate daily tasks.
Tiene una interfaz visual intuitiva, características avanzadas y una comunidad activa de usuarios. La plataforma permite crear automatizaciones complejas sin necesidad de escribir código, establecer flujos de trabajo complejos utilizando bucles, condicionales y variables, y solucionar rápidamente cualquier problema que surja gracias a sus herramientas de seguimiento de errores.
El precio y la curva de aprendizaje, ya que hay partes que son demasiado complejas de desarrollar y poner en juego. Y otra de ellas es que a veces experimenta desconexiones interrumpidas
Soluciona el problema de tener que realizar tareas repetitivas y manuales en múltiples plataformas y aplicaciones en línea. Al automatizar flujos de trabajo y procesos, se puede ahorrar tiempo y esfuerzo al evitar la necesidad de realizar tareas manualmente en diferentes plataformas y aplicaciones, lo que también reduce la posibilidad de errores. Además, al integrar múltiples plataformas y aplicaciones en una sola automatización, los usuarios pueden optimizar su trabajo y aumentar la eficiencia en la realización de tareas complejas.
Me ha permitido automatizar muchas pequeñas gestiones del día a día, que si las sumas se convierten en horas ahorradas cada semana. Además, es con diferencia la herramienta de automatización más fácil de usar del mercado (de todas las que he probado al menos).
Por el momento no ofrece tantas integraciones como Zapier, por lo que si usas muchos softwares diferentes posiblemente Make no sea suficiente. Otro problema que le veo es que no está disponible en español.
Me ahorra una cantidad de tiempo enorme en el día a día con automatizaciones muy sencillas de programar.
Lot Of Values to be transfer from glide to other application/website API. and its user friendly UI
a lot of method need to be learned, some app still need to crack
help my company employe to automate a form out from a CRM Data so they dont have to write it manually
With this tool, you can automate both day to day tasks. As well as serious projects at your enterprise. Even a child can handle the setting. And more functions.
This is a good tool for the beginner or inexperienced user. But there are also its shortcomings. The embedded database and its management is a nightmare. The same applies to any functions if they are more difficult than the entry level.
When it was necessary to quickly integrate different services or test hypotheses, this turned out to be the best and fastest solution. Also good for checking MVP.
Make helps make automations and rules possible within Notion for me that I'm currently unable to do via formulas. It's really nice that you get notified when the automation fails so you can get ahead of it. The user interface is also very pleasing.
Not so much a dislike as just a very strong learning curve. If I wasn't looking at instructions on how to set it up? I likely would have been lost. It has so many possibilities to it!
I use databases in Notion and I was trying to set up repeating tasks - when you check a box saying it's done, the next due date updates to the next needed one. There's not currently a way to do this within Notion so Make has made it possible.
I love how visual it is! Coding can be very confusing but integromat presents it in an easy to use way with their graphics and set up.
It has a bit of a learning curve! It is intuitive to do the basics but requires some extra knowledge to customize flows more.
It connects all of our applications and flows together!
Compared to Zapier, it is much cheaper and delivers a lot of good connections! Plus it's relatively easy to use!
They need to improve support and communication with customers urgently
Cheaper price per task performed and the ease of connecting with tools, even those that don't have a native app with them
Make helps create scenarios & connections between different resources in our enterprise. It also enables webhook-based execution in which we can run all scenarios parallelly and manage high workload & inbound requests. We can categorize our templates as either Public (Accessible by anyone in our organization) or Team (Accessible only by our Team members) which promotes reusability features and tailor our templates based on our needs.
Make Architecture is hosted predominantly on the Amazon Web Service platform, hence it's highly reliable and secure for our organization. For additional security, it offers SSO for user account management, authorization and authentication standards. It provides various function usability enhancements from which we can easily identify unclosed functions and prevent errors just by hovering over the part of the function.
Make platform integrates our Amazon S3 bucket & AWS Lambda function to our Datastore for our facilitating bucket creation, invoking trigger functions and creating records in our database. We utilize its Scenario editor to create our workflows and include modules to automate the process. We can schedule our scenario execution periodically through schedule settings and collect records from its logs for execution history.
I like the flexibility and customization that Integromat has compared to Zapier.
Sometimes certain apps require a few extra steps that can be a bit complicated to set up, but luckily not very often.
Automating several different workflows for myself and also for my clients.
Integromat integrates with all our business applications and just makes the links between them very flawless!
I think it could be a good idea to see test the flow with fake data instead of needing the submit your connection each time
Integromat will give all the team the needed information from all the applications without the need to log in each and every day
Integromat is one of the largest no-code automation platforms, which has decent pricing! For the ever-growing catalog of supported applications, it's value for money.
Even though Integromat's Catalog has 650 Native Apps, Comparatively, Zapier exceeds the expectations of supported applications! Zapier has their Zap Run Histories very much helpful while debugging. On the other hand, Integromat's workflow tests are not up to par.
We have connected our airtable database to do wonders for us with No-Code Automation Platforms. From payment reminders to sharing receipts and until posting reconcilation, there's a way to do anything and everything with a bit of work.
There is not much you can't do with Integromat. Using either existing connectors or just using Webhooks & API, all kinds of automation actions are possible. I'm using it to pull JSON data, push to MySQL in Google cloud, send emails, monitor Google Sheets, .... Where Zapier is mainstream and easy to use, Integromat is a Swiss knife.
Documentation is not always easy to understand. It would be best if you had some expert level of understanding of how data manipulation is done. The learning curve is quite steep.
connecting tools, creating triggers, ... stuff not possible with Zapier or other mainstream automation tooling.
The versatility of processes that you can create without coding is a considerable upside.
The fact that it doesn't exist a view where you can see the costs comparison by scenario.
From commercial to financial issues, even legal processes are being improved using this tool.
It's effortless to make an integration of several apps
The organization of the names and other integrations can get lost
integrations of several apps like google sheets, Facebook, crm, etc
Simple to set up and validate repetitive tasks
Some help examples are not easy to follow
Automating importing of CSV data from FTP links
Easy of use, we have a number of people using the system and they are able to pick it up quickly with no prior experience. They consistently adding new integrations and it is priced fairly.
No major complaints. There are some integrations we are egarly awaiting, but I am not sure how they process works, so it might not be on them. Sometimes their support team can be a little on the slow side.
We've been able to do a number of integrations with Google Workspace and other SaaS apps, allowing us to automate some workflows. With the way the available library continues to grow, I expect to be able to do even more in the future.
It's a flexible enough tool to cover most of our use cases.
The interface could be better. It's not obvious how to save, enable, and publish scenarios. Also, some kind of a debug mode would be useful.
Streaming information from various services to feeds in Slack.
Huge flexibility of the number of modules we can add, as well as the ability to scale up very quickly. Much much cheaper than alternative software.
Few bugs here and there we have to work around occasionally but the team seems to be on the ball
A lot of our backend is run by Integromat. No need to code up something for months when you can spin it up in a day with Integromat
multiple integrations and easy interaction on the platform
integrations are paused a lot due to errors and it is difficult to integrate with some platforms
it is cheaper than zapier. And we use it to integrate facebook lead ads with google sheet.
The interface is graphically appealing which made it approachable for a non-techie person. The steps for linking chains are somewhat intuitive. There customer service is excellent! Timothy was on top of my issue and provided support in a clear manner.
I would have liked an upfront tutorial on their terminology and which actions create certain outcomes. When you have an error in your chain it doesn't explain why the error is occurring...just that there is one. So you have to dive into a bit of detective work to figure it out.
I wanted to automate an action between GMail and Airtable. It saves me from needed to check my email for those specific types of orders and loads the appropriate information where I need it for my staff.
The core mechanism of Integromat is one part of the interest about the solution. It allows intensive triggering when a lot of api calls are in stake. It exceeds needs where others fail or become expensive. This said, the ease of use and the amount of ready to use functions is near perfection. The bubble design is pure beauty and pragmatic as a tool. The way to test operations and debug is also well executed. There, a lot of little tweaks are awaiting, a lot of tweaks, tweaks that make your like easier compared to vendor. I can't really coun't the amount of feature that start with a "how can I do that" to "Oh it's simple as that". And this was to manipulate nested arrays from a raw api call. This applies to documentation too. When other vendors tend to extended the reading to bring no solution, the solution are written in the documentation. I've reduced my amount of ticket by 3 or 4 that brings less downtime... All positive at this point, I've been using Integromat from free plan for almost a year, just ramp to a paid plan and it worth money by hundreds. To resume the product is what you ever excepted from other vendor for the last three years. Ah, the product is from Europe ! Nice.
There is a lack of premium apps to be integrated (like Marketo) that can be frustrated. But the community is growing fast, more developpers are coming to the platform so we can hope more apps in the future.
I tried to make a lot of automatization with other vendors those became unsustainable in term of pricing, with Integromat I can. I tried some code manipulation or complex arrays manipulation with other vendors those became undoable, with Intgromat I can. With Integromat I got what i've always deserve in term of performance and pricing.
We use a bunch of automation software on the market and the UI/UX of Integromat is great. It being a drag and drop interface is great for visualizing the automation and there are countless data manipulation options. Not many automation tools handle looping or arrays well, but Integromat does a great job with this.
It feels like this should be far easier to use than competitors like Zapier based on the UI/UX, but you often run into error codes that aren't straightforward or sensible. If an automation fails and errors out, it's tough to understand what happened and how you should go about fixing it. It does allow for more robust logic and error handling than other platforms though.
Connecting software and automating processes is the main use-case for Integromat. When requiring heavy logic surrounding Arrays and Looping is when we favor Integromat over competitors.
the visual UI tool to connect services and "program" business logic. Tech support is responsive
some of lesser used features with some modules have not been implemented well and/or tested completely
chatbot integration with online database. Great tool for quick prototyping
Visual building of the integration is well-conceived and helpful
The licensing system is per operation, and, oh boy, those operations add up real quick. We have quite simple integrations and we had to keep getting bigger and bigger plans
We gather data from Fulcrum App and use "Make" to analyse it and perform actions based on the analysis
It helps me keep tasks up to date. I save a lot of time by not worrying about certain actions because make already does it
It is difficult to learn to use it. Not much training on it. It would be great that they had a training program
Me ayuda a automatizar tareas como a almacenar datos de formularios, a crear entradas en mis bases de datos, a enviar correos...
With the recent rebrand and 'upgrade' to make there have been a number of usability and bug issues introduced to the platform. I have confidence that these will be resolved by the team, but it has created an unstable environment in make for many months now. I still utilize integromat.com for my personal workflows and have avoided migrating all my key accounts to make.com till the bugs and reliability have been improved on make.com. Integromat has so many different modules for connecting your Saas applications. I also love the flexibility they provide in regards to how many actions you can do for each connection. The visual representation of the integration is a game-changer and in my opinion makes integromat one of the leaders in this space. I used to have to create separate diagrams to document the workflows, but with integromat the integration is self documented in a powerful and visual manner. Their tool set provided for data manipulation, iteration, aggregation and so on is excellent and so far I haven't found a use-case that couldn't be automated with integromat. They even have an HTTP module which allows you to connect easily to any web service, even if they don't support it. This is also a game changer as it often times removes that last barrier to full automation that a tool like Zapier just can't handle on it's own.
Make.com was released as the flagship product too early in the development lifecycle. There are still bug fixes for features that need to be released and make workflows more difficult on the new platform than on integromat previously. I have confidence that the team can fix these, but the amount of time it is taking makes it difficult to use the platform or maintain confidence in the tooling.
integrating web based systems. Automatic Invoicing Automatic email responses Complex automations within PM software (Monday, Asana, etc...) Automatic file uploads/logging. Go-to for any automation / integration for all my consulting clients.
Helps us write more complex automations for Monday.com
I don't really use it. A 3rd party vendor recommended it and set it up for us
Allowing us to create more complex workflows for Monday.com
