Unclaimed: Are you working at Make?
Make Reviews: 4.7/5 — Highly Rated
Make is an iPaaS software that lets you build as if you were a developer, with minimal coding knowledge. With Make, users can create as many workflows as needed and integrate an infinite number of apps in a single workflow. It also includes advanced features like iterations, aggregations, conditional logic, filtering, error handling, execution history log, and more.
| Capabilities |
API
|
|---|---|
| Segment |
Small Business
Mid Market
Enterprise
|
| Deployment | Cloud / SaaS / Web-Based |
| Support | 24/7 (Live rep), Chat, Email/Help Desk, FAQs/Forum, Knowledge Base, Phone Support |
| Training | Documentation |
| Languages | English |
Make gives you 5 GB of monthly data transfer on its $9 Core plan. On the $16 Pro plan it is 5 GB. On the $29 Teams plan it is 5 GB. On Enterprise it is 5 GB. Maximum file size climbs steadily across those tiers — 100 MB, 250 MB, 500 MB, 1000 MB — which reads as though throughput is scaling with price. It is not. If your automations move a lot of data rather than a few large files, the cheapest paid plan gives you exactly as much room as the most expensive one.
- What it is: A visual, no-code automation platform in the iPaaS category, connecting 3,000-plus apps.
- Best for: Teams building multi-step workflows visually rather than writing integration code.
- Pricing: Free; Core $9, Pro $16, Teams $29 per month at 10,000 credits; Enterprise quoted. Verified July 2026.
- The honest catch: The free plan enforces a 15-minute minimum interval between runs.
What Is Make?
Make — formerly Integromat — is a visual automation platform. You build scenarios by dragging modules onto a canvas and wiring them together, with routers, filters, and error handling, across more than 3,000 connected apps. It is the more visual and more powerful end of the no-code automation market, sitting between Zapier’s simplicity and a developer-grade integration platform.
The meter is credits. Make’s own FAQ defines them plainly: “Every time a module in a scenario performs an action, it consumes credits. For example, when your scenario reads a record from Pipedrive, writes a row into a Google Sheet, or posts a tweet, each counts as one credit.” Most actions cost one, but the page notes that “some advanced features leveraging Make’s AI Provider may use more” — so AI-heavy scenarios burn the allowance faster than the count of steps suggests.
All three published plans start at the 10,000-credit level and scale upward through a selector running 20k, 40k, 80k, 150k, 300k, 500k, 750k, 1M and beyond, to 8M and above.
How Make Works
- Credits are the primary meter, from 1,000 free to 8M-plus.
- Prices quoted are at 10,000 credits — the selector raises them from there.
- Data transfer is flat at 5 GB on every paid tier.
- The free plan throttles frequency, not just volume.
- Annual billing saves “15% or more.”
- AI actions can consume more than one credit each.
Make Pricing
Captured from Make’s pricing page in July 2026 in US dollars, at the 10,000-credit level.
| Plan | Monthly | Credits | Data transfer | Max file | Logs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 1,000/mo | 512 MB | 5 MB | 7 days |
| Core | $9 | 10,000+ | 5 GB | 100 MB | 30 days |
| Pro | $16 | 10,000+ | 5 GB | 250 MB | 30 days |
| Teams | $29 | 10,000+ | 5 GB | 500 MB | 30 days |
| Enterprise | Quoted | Custom | 5 GB | 1000 MB | 60 days |
What actually decides your plan:
- Data transfer does not scale with price. Every paid tier from $9 to Enterprise allows 5 GB a month. What does scale is the maximum size of a single file — 100 MB, 250 MB, 500 MB, 1000 MB. Those are different constraints, and only one of them is a throughput limit. A workflow syncing thousands of small records hits the same ceiling on Teams as on Core.
- The free plan’s real limit is the clock, not the credits. A 15-minute minimum interval between runs means nothing on the free tier can respond promptly to anything. Combined with two active scenarios, it is a demonstration environment rather than a working one. Per-minute scheduling is the single biggest thing $9 buys.
- Core at $9 is a genuinely complete plan. Unlimited active scenarios, scheduling down to the minute, API access, 100 MB files, and 30-day logs. Most of what people upgrade for is not capacity but collaboration.
- Pro buys speed and searchability. Priority scenario execution, custom variables, and full-text execution log search for $7 more. If you are debugging complex scenarios regularly, full-text log search alone can justify it; if you are not, it will not.
- Teams is a per-organisation feature, not a per-seat one. Team roles and shared scenario templates at $29 is the plan for more than one builder. Note that it does not raise your data transfer or your log retention.
- Credits are what you actually budget. The published $9, $16, and $29 are the entry configuration at 10,000 credits. Model your monthly action count first, then read the price at that step, because the selector is what moves the bill.
Who Should Use Make
- Teams building genuinely complex workflows. The clearest case — routers, filters, and error handling make Make substantially more capable than simpler tools.
- Anyone automating across many apps. More than 3,000 integrations, with a visual canvas that keeps multi-branch logic legible.
- Budget-conscious automators. At $9 for unlimited scenarios and per-minute scheduling, Core undercuts most of the category.
- Operations teams standardising a process. Shared templates and team roles on the $29 Teams plan.
It fits poorly for high-volume data movement, where the flat 5 GB ceiling applies at every price; for teams wanting the simplest possible tool, where the visual canvas is more than they need; and for organisations requiring self-hosting, which Make does not offer.
Honest Pros and Cons
Strengths
- $9 for unlimited active scenarios and per-minute scheduling.
- 3,000-plus app integrations on every tier including free.
- A genuinely powerful visual builder with routers, filters, and branching.
- A permanent free plan with no time limit.
- A clear, published definition of what a credit is.
- Annual billing saves 15% or more.
Limitations
- Data transfer is 5 GB on every paid plan, from $9 to Enterprise.
- The free plan enforces a 15-minute minimum interval.
- Only two active scenarios on free.
- Log retention stays at 30 days through Teams.
- AI-powered actions consume more than one credit each.
- The published prices describe only the 10,000-credit step.
Make Alternatives and How It Compares
- n8n is the closest technical competitor and can be self-hosted, which Make cannot.
- Zapier is simpler and better known, with a larger app catalogue and higher prices.
- Workato and Tray.ai target enterprise integration with quoted pricing.
- Pabbly Connect and Activepieces compete at the budget end.
- Power Automate is the natural choice inside a Microsoft estate.
For a broader survey, browse our iPaaS directory.
The Verdict
Make is the best-value serious automation platform in this category, and the reason is Core. At $9 a month you get unlimited active scenarios, scheduling down to the minute, API access, and the full visual builder with routers, filters, and branching. Competitors charge multiples of that for less capability, and the free plan — permanent, with 1,000 credits and 3,000-plus integrations — is a real way to evaluate it rather than a countdown.
One number does not do what its neighbours imply. The monthly data transfer allowance is 5 GB on Core, 5 GB on Pro, 5 GB on Teams, and 5 GB on Enterprise. Sitting right beside it, maximum file size climbs from 100 MB to 1000 MB across the same tiers, which makes the whole block read like a capacity ladder. It is not one. Single-file size and total monthly throughput are different limits, and only the first improves as you pay. If your scenarios move large volumes of small records — a nightly sync, a high-traffic webhook, a data warehouse feed — upgrading from Core to Teams buys you collaboration features and precisely no additional headroom.
Two smaller things worth pricing in. The free plan’s binding constraint is the 15-minute minimum interval between runs, not the credit allowance — nothing on it can react promptly, which makes it unsuitable for anything user-facing regardless of volume. And the published $9, $16, and $29 describe the 10,000-credit configuration only; the selector runs to eight million and beyond, so estimate your monthly action count before treating any of those figures as your price. Make deserves credit for defining a credit unambiguously in its own FAQ, which is more than several competitors manage.
FAQ
How much does Make cost?
Captured in July 2026 in US dollars at the 10,000-credit level: Free at $0 with up to 1,000 credits a month, Core at $9, Pro at $16, and Teams at $29 per month, with Enterprise quoted. All paid plans use a credit selector running from 10,000 up past eight million, and the price rises with it. Annual billing saves “15% or more” according to the page.
What is a credit in Make?
An action performed by a module. Make’s FAQ states: “Every time a module in a scenario performs an action, it consumes credits. For example, when your scenario reads a record from Pipedrive, writes a row into a Google Sheet, or posts a tweet, each counts as one credit.” Most actions cost one credit, but the page notes that some advanced features using Make’s AI Provider consume more.
Does a more expensive Make plan give more data transfer?
No. The monthly data transfer allowance is 512 MB on Free and then a flat 5 GB on Core, Pro, Teams, and Enterprise alike. What does increase across those tiers is the maximum size of an individual file — 100 MB, 250 MB, 500 MB, and 1000 MB respectively. Those are separate limits, and only the file-size one scales with price.
What are the limits on Make’s free plan?
Up to 1,000 credits per month, a maximum of two active scenarios, a 15-minute minimum interval between runs, 512 MB of data transfer, 5 MB maximum file size, and 7 days of execution log storage. It has no time limit. In practice the 15-minute interval is the constraint that matters most, since it rules out anything that needs to respond promptly.
Make or n8n?
Both are powerful visual automation tools at similar price points, and the deciding factor is usually hosting. n8n can be self-hosted, which matters for teams with data residency or compliance requirements, and it appeals more to technical users. Make is fully managed, has a more polished builder, and a larger catalogue of ready-made integrations. Choose n8n for control, Make for convenience.
Compare Make with other popular tools in the same category.
Ability to have multiple environments and to backup code assets.
Not much to dislike; it still needs some additional features like global variables; but those are on their roadmap.
Data movement between various cloud platforms
Integromat is one of those rare pieces of SAAS that is getting smarter at a rate far faster than its competitors. The language has been simple to learn as a "non coder" and have continued to bring me more and more confidence. You can begin by automating simple things via templates and then advance your skills by reading articles or guides. I have also enjoyed the increase in tools that make sense (like search functionality in the API connections, I never thought to ask for it but Integromat delivered and made life even more simple. I am a huge fan!
Sometimes the validation messages can be a little vague. However, these seem to be improving as you go. It is also not easy to teach someone how to use the system. They really need to experience it by using it. If Integromat were to create some tutorials that involve building things then I suspect that would be a MASSIVE step forward.
Automation flow, Reducing "dumb" tasks and data entry. Building functions to reduce fraud. The sky is the limit and we keep building smarter tools as we go. When you experience what can be done it gets your mind thinking about where to next. Just start, you won't regret it.
UI is one of the best for self-serve / non-technical configuration. Pricing is also the most reaasonable when compared to similar tools.
Some features are lacking robust documentation, but the support team is always responsive.
Automating customer communications, business operations, and marketing efforts.
A significant number of modules included, easy to use, good docs, responsive support team, and superb design.
I only faced an issue that the module I need (Crisp chat) is not there yet.
I connect different services (forms, slack, scheduling, CRM) and hooks to provide the clients and the team with the information they need fast and accurately. It reduces a lot of manual work, i.e., googles sheet records adding, copying the posts from one place to another, sending emails to clients when something happens.
Integromat has allowed us to automate some giant portions of our business for far cheaper than Zapier. Most people probably start with Zapier, and then when things get too complex, they move over to a product like Integromat. For us, we've been able to automate connections to Drip, MailChimp, Mixpanel, Google Sheets. We have over 50 active scenarios.
The only thing I wish was better was the ability to define retry logic for scenarios when they die. For example, sometimes the best thing to do is to just wait 10 minutes and retry again if a certain error is encountered.
We were trying to connect a bunch of our marketing and analytics systems without code.
The amount of customization you can setup between integrations
Nothing to dislike for me, i like everything
Connecting different companies API's - mainly an online ordering system with an instore POS. Also so many other things like a loyalty system database with automated emailing to customers. I also use it for triggering lots of other parts of different API's like requesting report data from my POS and receiving it via whatsapp
Integromat takes automation to the next level by integrating with an amazing amount of services (with more being added all the time) and they do each integration well, not just to add a name to the list of integrations.
While the service integrates with an abundant amount of services, they are missing a few obvious ones like Ebay.
We're able to integrate internal infrastructure with external services that was previously not possible. This gives us an edge with competition!
It is very simple and powerful, always that we need some integration it is possible with Integromat
Nothing, i loved integromat because solved my integration needs.
Trigger webhook to send emails, update a database or write on a spreadsheet (google sheet). Some of the scenarios are complex, but with integromat and their filter, we could build them.
It's simple enough to get started yet powerful enough to support custom systems and software if needed. It's easy for non-developers to get started with as well. We previously tried using tools like Zapier or Microsoft Flow, but none of those were nearly as powerful or full-featured as Integromat.
The pricing model can be confusing, and you don't know how much you're going to pay until you start building out an integration.
Integromat helps my team integrate data from different third-party systems, like CRMs and support software, directly into each other. For example, when a new user asks a question via Intercom, that interaction can automatically trigger our CRM to add a tag and even log a note about when we last interacted with the customer. It also lets us integrate directly with our application and update data within our database based on emails and other interactions from *outside* of our application.
Integromat is so incredibly inexpensive for what it provides. I use it to build out complex automations where I used to have to pay a developer to do so. At this point, it feels like anything I can dream up can be accomplished via Integromat.
I just wish I'd known about Integromat sooner, it's changed our entire business. Now anytime a new product or campaign launches, I go through my checklist of connections. Facebook Conversion APIs, email platform APIs, Google Sheets, Slack, and so much more.
We're saving hundreds of man/woman-hours per month so we can focus on things that only humans can do. We use Integromat for stuff like real-time metrics, integrating various platforms, delivering custom products, and more.
It is easy to use but allows more complex automations than its competition. I also like how it is updated nearly every day with new features. It is an ever-evolving and expensing product.
At times it can be not very easy when it comes to testing. It is easy to use up your month's allocation when building new automation as you test out features and try to work through them.
Automated emails. Ticket assignments and traffic direction.
Integromat provides looping logic, the widest variety of service integrations I've seen, and is easy to understand even with complex scenarios. It contains features that make creating scenarios easy in contrast to many integration services. The documentation Integromat provides to users includes a wide variety of nuances in the APIs it supports and clearly shows Integromat is experienced in how those APIs work.
Integromat scenario testing can be difficult since the cost is identical to running the scenario live. It can be difficult to work with some of the in-text functions. The documentation is lighter here and needs better examples.
Integromat, through webhooks and instant events, is bringing data about tasks and meetings in front of developers when they need it. Integromat helps us keep notes about meetings through Google Calendar and ClickUp integrations. It also assists us in bringing meetings into our project management software to see our meeting capacity in relation to other development tasks.
We use both Zapier and Integromat and if we could switch everything over to one service it would be Integromat. The canvas to create workflows is amazing. We love the ability to update to modify any of the workflows without having to start over like zapier. The queue for when workflows go wrong is amazing. We can pick up where we left off very easily and remove offending tasks without losing any tasks that followed after the error.
Wish there were better access to custom fields in WooCommerce and Trello
Integromat helps us connect our HubSpot, Trello and WooCommerce applications together. It's easier to manage than Zapier and saves us tons of money on hiring developers.
Intuitive, lots of pre-built modules but also custom capability
Some documentation needs improvement & chat support would be excellent
Document management & sharing, reporting, user management
Integromat lets me connect completely different products and services and create workflows as if they are built to work together. For example, when I receive order in PrestaShop, Integromat can automatically recreate the order in my order ERP system built with Podio. Or when I publish a new product on my PrestaShop online store, Integromat lets me automatically create a blog post about it in WordPress, publish it on Facebook and then publish it on Instagram. With Integromat, I can also integrate Podio and SendInBlue so I can send emails on different events in Podio, like when a user subscribes, and send them an email thru SendInBlue and also track the email events, like open, view, click - directly in Podio. The phone integration is also awesome - you can log all your calls and messages in another system bor backup or just for easier reference. The workflow builder in Integromat is amazingly flexible and provides excellent flexibility. You don't need to have an IT degree to use it to its best. You can create branches, loops, and all kinds of workflows. I started Integromat as a free user but then gradually upgraded my plan because the more I use it, the more valuable ways to use it I find. The integrations in Integromat save me a lot of time, which saves me money!
Sometimes I can't find an integration for a specific service.
Integromat lets me integrate completely separate services I am using on a daily basis and automates my work. This saves me a lot of time and prevents me from forgetting or delaying a task - it just does it automatically on the fly.
The support is stellar and there's a really useful and supportive Facebook user group. There's an extensive range of APIs and integrations. There's a wish list for future improvements, APIs and integrations. The interface is visual and intuitive. There's a clear pricing structure that's highly competitive compared to similar alternative products. You can set up instant email alerts for any kind of issue or error with a scenario.
Sometimes the third party APIs are slow to update their integrations - such as Pinterest - but that's no discredit to Integromat. There is a steep learning curve to begin with.
Solved all our internal calendaring issues. Streamlined email filtering. Gained 10 hours+ back per week through efficiencies generated by using Integromat.
Support, lots of features and affordable price
Integromat is better than any similar software we've been working with - the only downside is that support docs sometimes don't cover every feature
Integromat helps us to connect our systems to database and automatize workflow.
Customer Support, they are by far the best team ive ever had. they help with EVERYTHING, even create a flow from 0.
i really got nothing that i dislike about it.
connecting all my apps together
Very useful solution for connecting multiple apps. Received excellent and timely support from Alex.
It's a learning curve, but that's the payoff you get with the flexibility...
Connecting multiple apps together to avoid having to re-enter data - saving time and reducing potential for data entry errors.
functionality, particularly with older file types like txt, csv and using ftp. Also love their support.
can be tricky sometimes to get a scenario correct if you are not a developer/programmer.
we've been able to import customer data from csv to shopify including metafields that we have not been able to do with other apps. we can also export orders in a required layout as a csv to our ERP via ftp. we also feed our suppliers social media posts to our own local social media pages without human intervention.
Knowing that there really is somebody there to help and respond to us. The pricing is also very good.
Nothing to dislike about this company and service.
Integration with Cognito Forms (also very good)
Full API connection, easy usage, great opportunity
No Coding, no converger, less apps and more unknown compared to Zapier
Amazing solutions
The fact it easily connects to any API. The fact you get support from the first second (even before becoming a paying customer). The fact there is a great facebook group which also gives support.
The only dislike is documentation. It can be much better and with better examples.
Integromat is actually the base for our marketing and sales processes. It helps us with distributing our content as well as outreach in so many ways. We collect business intelligence through it and actually all major decision in the company today are result of feedback we got from customers whom we approached through integromat
The ability to create scenarios and test them on the fly with just a few minutes.
there isn't an option to simplify thing using a "built-in" Python code
automate things over Zendesk and Jira process + paying attention to important emails and sent them on a Slack channel
The graphic layout reminds me of Max, and since I don't really know how to code I love being able to build something in a visual language like this.
Ehh, not much, but some of the action descriptions are confusing. The one consistently annoying thing is if you add a router to a flow with a filter, the filter will always default to the left of the router when I almost always want it to go to the right of the router. I don't know if there's a way to change it without rebuilding the filter (easy).
We release educational content 365 days a year with a very consistent production workflow and this opens up endless endless possibilities for managing this within monday.com
I like the user interface and easy to use to integrate almost all of applications my clients need to use. A huge variety of using, a lot of settings, triggers, working with numbers and string and much more ... this is amazing! Integromat is suitable even as for beginners and basic usage as for solutions in enterprise environment.
Sometimes I get an error with no detailed explanation (maybe it is not the integromat's problem but the application's I try to integrate...), there are a couple of parameters missing in one or two applications I want to use to integrate. But, in any case I have not found the kind of problem I have not been able to solve it, so far.
Optimizing processes, integration more systems/applications together, data exchanging. I can save my client's time (= money) because of automation running in Integromat.
Easy to learn, very powerful, great community
Still waiting for Integromat 2.0 release
We're using tons of 3rd party apps (mostly SaaS based), Integromat really helped us make an order in them
Its hard to describe what is actually the best. The biggest "value added" is intuitive UI which helps a lot in making automated scenarios.. so a total newbie can make himself some valuable automation without a knowledge of any code. In that I see the future and Integromat opened my eyes and made my life easier
I dont realy dislike anything. Maybe there could be more user friendly manual on custom https requests or Oauth2 but is so advanced anyway that most non-coding users will struggle with it anyways. Some manuals are even missing on some modules but thats quite ok because the system is intuitive so its not that big deal
Right now its my job to automate workflows etc for our clients. But when I was a sales man and my friend showed me integromat I have solved my post-aquisition workflow so it reduced my workflow from 40 minutes to 2 minutes which was amazing. That day I saw a huge potential that this platform can bring to ordinary ppl in their job routines
Quick and easy visual setup of complex automation tasks.
Documentation sometimes lags of information.
I'm using integromat for almost anything in my business. It allows me to automate a very high percentage of my tasks and helps me to build backend integrations without any coding knowledge. I learned how to work with any kind of API and can make use of it through integromat. There are still tons of things I didn't explore yet but that are very useful like discovering new integromat functions and their usage all the time.
Ease of use, very user friendly. Worked great with any platform I tried to connect and integrate with. Super innovative product and huge ecosystem which covers most of the popular solutions in the world. Also, the team is just awesome and assists with any questions.
Nothing much.. The solution is great and we found everything we needed and more.
We automate everything I find myself doing more than once. For example, we are running many internal processes of updating data in our databases, based on data from other platforms.
