Unclaimed: Are you working at Make?
Make Reviews: 4.7/5 — Highly Rated
Make is an iPaaS software that lets you build as if you were a developer, with minimal coding knowledge. With Make, users can create as many workflows as needed and integrate an infinite number of apps in a single workflow. It also includes advanced features like iterations, aggregations, conditional logic, filtering, error handling, execution history log, and more.
| Capabilities |
API
|
|---|---|
| Segment |
Small Business
Mid Market
Enterprise
|
| Deployment | Cloud / SaaS / Web-Based |
| Support | 24/7 (Live rep), Chat, Email/Help Desk, FAQs/Forum, Knowledge Base, Phone Support |
| Training | Documentation |
| Languages | English |
Make gives you 5 GB of monthly data transfer on its $9 Core plan. On the $16 Pro plan it is 5 GB. On the $29 Teams plan it is 5 GB. On Enterprise it is 5 GB. Maximum file size climbs steadily across those tiers — 100 MB, 250 MB, 500 MB, 1000 MB — which reads as though throughput is scaling with price. It is not. If your automations move a lot of data rather than a few large files, the cheapest paid plan gives you exactly as much room as the most expensive one.
- What it is: A visual, no-code automation platform in the iPaaS category, connecting 3,000-plus apps.
- Best for: Teams building multi-step workflows visually rather than writing integration code.
- Pricing: Free; Core $9, Pro $16, Teams $29 per month at 10,000 credits; Enterprise quoted. Verified July 2026.
- The honest catch: The free plan enforces a 15-minute minimum interval between runs.
What Is Make?
Make — formerly Integromat — is a visual automation platform. You build scenarios by dragging modules onto a canvas and wiring them together, with routers, filters, and error handling, across more than 3,000 connected apps. It is the more visual and more powerful end of the no-code automation market, sitting between Zapier’s simplicity and a developer-grade integration platform.
The meter is credits. Make’s own FAQ defines them plainly: “Every time a module in a scenario performs an action, it consumes credits. For example, when your scenario reads a record from Pipedrive, writes a row into a Google Sheet, or posts a tweet, each counts as one credit.” Most actions cost one, but the page notes that “some advanced features leveraging Make’s AI Provider may use more” — so AI-heavy scenarios burn the allowance faster than the count of steps suggests.
All three published plans start at the 10,000-credit level and scale upward through a selector running 20k, 40k, 80k, 150k, 300k, 500k, 750k, 1M and beyond, to 8M and above.
How Make Works
- Credits are the primary meter, from 1,000 free to 8M-plus.
- Prices quoted are at 10,000 credits — the selector raises them from there.
- Data transfer is flat at 5 GB on every paid tier.
- The free plan throttles frequency, not just volume.
- Annual billing saves “15% or more.”
- AI actions can consume more than one credit each.
Make Pricing
Captured from Make’s pricing page in July 2026 in US dollars, at the 10,000-credit level.
| Plan | Monthly | Credits | Data transfer | Max file | Logs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 1,000/mo | 512 MB | 5 MB | 7 days |
| Core | $9 | 10,000+ | 5 GB | 100 MB | 30 days |
| Pro | $16 | 10,000+ | 5 GB | 250 MB | 30 days |
| Teams | $29 | 10,000+ | 5 GB | 500 MB | 30 days |
| Enterprise | Quoted | Custom | 5 GB | 1000 MB | 60 days |
What actually decides your plan:
- Data transfer does not scale with price. Every paid tier from $9 to Enterprise allows 5 GB a month. What does scale is the maximum size of a single file — 100 MB, 250 MB, 500 MB, 1000 MB. Those are different constraints, and only one of them is a throughput limit. A workflow syncing thousands of small records hits the same ceiling on Teams as on Core.
- The free plan’s real limit is the clock, not the credits. A 15-minute minimum interval between runs means nothing on the free tier can respond promptly to anything. Combined with two active scenarios, it is a demonstration environment rather than a working one. Per-minute scheduling is the single biggest thing $9 buys.
- Core at $9 is a genuinely complete plan. Unlimited active scenarios, scheduling down to the minute, API access, 100 MB files, and 30-day logs. Most of what people upgrade for is not capacity but collaboration.
- Pro buys speed and searchability. Priority scenario execution, custom variables, and full-text execution log search for $7 more. If you are debugging complex scenarios regularly, full-text log search alone can justify it; if you are not, it will not.
- Teams is a per-organisation feature, not a per-seat one. Team roles and shared scenario templates at $29 is the plan for more than one builder. Note that it does not raise your data transfer or your log retention.
- Credits are what you actually budget. The published $9, $16, and $29 are the entry configuration at 10,000 credits. Model your monthly action count first, then read the price at that step, because the selector is what moves the bill.
Who Should Use Make
- Teams building genuinely complex workflows. The clearest case — routers, filters, and error handling make Make substantially more capable than simpler tools.
- Anyone automating across many apps. More than 3,000 integrations, with a visual canvas that keeps multi-branch logic legible.
- Budget-conscious automators. At $9 for unlimited scenarios and per-minute scheduling, Core undercuts most of the category.
- Operations teams standardising a process. Shared templates and team roles on the $29 Teams plan.
It fits poorly for high-volume data movement, where the flat 5 GB ceiling applies at every price; for teams wanting the simplest possible tool, where the visual canvas is more than they need; and for organisations requiring self-hosting, which Make does not offer.
Honest Pros and Cons
Strengths
- $9 for unlimited active scenarios and per-minute scheduling.
- 3,000-plus app integrations on every tier including free.
- A genuinely powerful visual builder with routers, filters, and branching.
- A permanent free plan with no time limit.
- A clear, published definition of what a credit is.
- Annual billing saves 15% or more.
Limitations
- Data transfer is 5 GB on every paid plan, from $9 to Enterprise.
- The free plan enforces a 15-minute minimum interval.
- Only two active scenarios on free.
- Log retention stays at 30 days through Teams.
- AI-powered actions consume more than one credit each.
- The published prices describe only the 10,000-credit step.
Make Alternatives and How It Compares
- n8n is the closest technical competitor and can be self-hosted, which Make cannot.
- Zapier is simpler and better known, with a larger app catalogue and higher prices.
- Workato and Tray.ai target enterprise integration with quoted pricing.
- Pabbly Connect and Activepieces compete at the budget end.
- Power Automate is the natural choice inside a Microsoft estate.
For a broader survey, browse our iPaaS directory.
The Verdict
Make is the best-value serious automation platform in this category, and the reason is Core. At $9 a month you get unlimited active scenarios, scheduling down to the minute, API access, and the full visual builder with routers, filters, and branching. Competitors charge multiples of that for less capability, and the free plan — permanent, with 1,000 credits and 3,000-plus integrations — is a real way to evaluate it rather than a countdown.
One number does not do what its neighbours imply. The monthly data transfer allowance is 5 GB on Core, 5 GB on Pro, 5 GB on Teams, and 5 GB on Enterprise. Sitting right beside it, maximum file size climbs from 100 MB to 1000 MB across the same tiers, which makes the whole block read like a capacity ladder. It is not one. Single-file size and total monthly throughput are different limits, and only the first improves as you pay. If your scenarios move large volumes of small records — a nightly sync, a high-traffic webhook, a data warehouse feed — upgrading from Core to Teams buys you collaboration features and precisely no additional headroom.
Two smaller things worth pricing in. The free plan’s binding constraint is the 15-minute minimum interval between runs, not the credit allowance — nothing on it can react promptly, which makes it unsuitable for anything user-facing regardless of volume. And the published $9, $16, and $29 describe the 10,000-credit configuration only; the selector runs to eight million and beyond, so estimate your monthly action count before treating any of those figures as your price. Make deserves credit for defining a credit unambiguously in its own FAQ, which is more than several competitors manage.
FAQ
How much does Make cost?
Captured in July 2026 in US dollars at the 10,000-credit level: Free at $0 with up to 1,000 credits a month, Core at $9, Pro at $16, and Teams at $29 per month, with Enterprise quoted. All paid plans use a credit selector running from 10,000 up past eight million, and the price rises with it. Annual billing saves “15% or more” according to the page.
What is a credit in Make?
An action performed by a module. Make’s FAQ states: “Every time a module in a scenario performs an action, it consumes credits. For example, when your scenario reads a record from Pipedrive, writes a row into a Google Sheet, or posts a tweet, each counts as one credit.” Most actions cost one credit, but the page notes that some advanced features using Make’s AI Provider consume more.
Does a more expensive Make plan give more data transfer?
No. The monthly data transfer allowance is 512 MB on Free and then a flat 5 GB on Core, Pro, Teams, and Enterprise alike. What does increase across those tiers is the maximum size of an individual file — 100 MB, 250 MB, 500 MB, and 1000 MB respectively. Those are separate limits, and only the file-size one scales with price.
What are the limits on Make’s free plan?
Up to 1,000 credits per month, a maximum of two active scenarios, a 15-minute minimum interval between runs, 512 MB of data transfer, 5 MB maximum file size, and 7 days of execution log storage. It has no time limit. In practice the 15-minute interval is the constraint that matters most, since it rules out anything that needs to respond promptly.
Make or n8n?
Both are powerful visual automation tools at similar price points, and the deciding factor is usually hosting. n8n can be self-hosted, which matters for teams with data residency or compliance requirements, and it appeals more to technical users. Make is fully managed, has a more polished builder, and a larger catalogue of ready-made integrations. Choose n8n for control, Make for convenience.
Compare Make with other popular tools in the same category.
Once up and running the interface is really easy to use and create powerful automations
It takes time to get up to speed and no what to look for when trying to fix bugs and issues with automations
Specifically I couldn't schedule LinkedIn ads to run at the times I wanted so created an automation with Make to address this
Make is a simple-to-use no-code integration platform that has many connectors for both incoming and outgoing data. It allows you to process data from multiple sources very quickly, do some flow control, and send output to other sources. I found it easy to use and understand and it saved me a lot of time in developing and setting up simple integrations that I would otherwise would have had to develop.
I would say the least helpful part was the transition from Integromat (the old system) to Make (the new system) which required me to set up almost everything from scratch. Also, in many cases, it was less-than-intuitive to set up some integrations and required me to read support documentation.
I needed to connect our Webflow website to our email marketing platform and CRM, with several flow control cases. I was also using it to send API calls from our marketing website to our operational system for doing some calculations and metrics.
Make stands out as a remarkable automation tool, offering an exceptional experience in mobile automation, like log SMS, Call. As a developer and someone keen on low-code solutions, I found Make to be a highly valuable addition to my toolkit. Its unique strengths lie in its visually intuitive interface and support for complex flow, making it a standout performer in the realm of mobile automation. What I loved most about Make is its user-friendly UI, which makes the entire automation process a breeze. Whether you are a seasoned developer or someone looking to harness the power of low-code solutions, Make caters to both skill levels effortlessly. The drag-and-drop feature simplifies the automation workflow, allowing you to create intricate processes with ease.
Occasionally, the output values do not display as expected (Call duration,..). This can be a bit frustrating when trying to troubleshoot or validate the automation process. Nonetheless, this issue is infrequent and has not significantly affected my overall experience with the tool. The UI is quite boring
We have streamlined our processes and enhanced overall efficiency.It has allowed us to automate various tasks across multiple software platforms, reducing manual labor and potential errors.
* It has more nocode automation building features than any other platforms * Support for APIs, Webhooks, Internal database, and many built-in tools * Fluid and convenient drag-and-drop editor * Cost-efficient and extremely versatile * The company is always improving features overtime
* No native code (javascript or python) processor * Delay option is limited
* It reduces repetitive and manual actions from a company * Saves hundreds of hours of work for our company in a month * Produces less error compared to human counterpart
Integromat.io (now called Make.io) is a really good solution for anyone who wants to make their life easier by automating their repetitive tasks. The website features an easy to use drag-and-drop workflow builder that is very intuitive.
Off the top of my head, I cannot think of anything that made me dislike this platform. The pricing could be a little better, but they do provide pretty generous free limits.
I have been using Integromat to connect my Airtable and emails and slack. It has made it so much easier to send out templated emails to clients as needed, whenever the database gets updated.
Tiene una usabilidad muy por encima de sus competidores. Si has usado Zapier, al principio se te hará raro pero cuando trabajas un poco verás que su usabiidad y potencia está a otro nivel
El precio basado en procesos puede hacer que rápidamente subas el número de procesos gastados y te toque subir de nivel tu cuenta. Si haces tareas muy repetitivas puedes tener un problema con el precio.
Intento hacer que Make haga todas aquellas tareas repetitivas de mi día a día. Tanto a nivel de marketing como a nivel de productividad personal. Puedes hacer casi cualquier tarea que se te ocurra. Si lo puedes estandarizar lo puedes hacer con Make
Technically talking I like that it really works and let you connect hundreds of apps through it, working just fine. Talking about UX/UI I really like the easy that the graphical map lets you connect between apps is so simple and intuitive and probably is this what makes differente from other solutions. Finally but not less integromat has apps that you can't find in other automation tools and here I'm talking specifically about Telgrem the main reason why we started to use Integromat.
Is not really a big issue but Integromat has an opportunity to improve the easiness of connecting new apps. Right now the requirements needed in order to connect aps sometimes involves in looking for API, KEYS, looking for users IDs in the browser bar, I'm ok with this but less techical people will have issues wondering how to connect apps. The other thing is that the look and feeling of the menus are not appealing so I was in doubt if the tool actually worked but as soon as I saw the UX/UI of the graphical map where you connect everything I realized that they were putting all the effort in this map not in the menus.
We are basically automating a lot of forms that have to be connected with google sheets and telegram. Since Integromat was the only automation tool already integrated with Telegram that I found. I had to use it but in the path I realized that is a really complete tool. So this forms are connected with Telegram bots and these bots are updating status in several Telegram groups and distribution lists where many of our drivers have to be checking up for updates. The other part is to connect all the data generated by the forms to google sheets where technical people will use the information for other purposes. for us this was an easy an economical integration compared with using a in house solution.
The interface is clear and easy to understand, I like how flexible it is. I was new to Make and managed to learn how to make use of it in my passive income stream.
There is a lot of app available for integration but 2 of my important apps (Podia & Deadline Funnel) are still not available. I hope they could add them in the future.
I'm creating customized digital content, Make made the process automation possible, and at a very affordable price to me. I can't imagine doing it manually or using other pricier alternatives.
It has helped me integrate my sales funnels from various websites
Less tutorial available as of now in market
Integrating my Leads from Indiamart, Justdial to Smartsheet,
No-code process and allow multiple flows. Most important is free plan has 1,000 functions.
Some logical functions can be more visualized, prevent wrong logic issues.
Integration Notion and survey result and automatically build Notion data. It's effortless to make automatically internal process, and sometimes you even have to pay.
I like the visual editor for workflows, it's so much better than other tools. And also provides with more flexibility in the nodes and connections.
Some nodes are outdated or limited in their implementation, so it forces you to use the HTTP node to consume an API. And that node has its problems too.
Any repetitive work that I do, I just throw some Integromat into the mix to make my life easier. I've also used it for no-code simple apps.
Integromat is an easy-to-use automation tool. I like the user-friendly interface and the variety of functions you can give to the connections you make between your apps. Also, it's a great alternative for Zapier users.
So far, Integromat performs well for our automation tasks between emails and spreadsheets, also, between WordPress and our CRM. I cannot mention something that I dislike so far.
Automation to capture specific information from emails, and automation between WordPress and CRM platform to match customer information. The mentioned automation helps us to achieve marketing milestones faster.
ease of use is on the level. Without dev skills, you basically can build integrations and it's awesome
maybe search for the modules.. the keyword you put search not only between different apps and functions but also inside the app's tasks
Backup of the call recordings into the cloud
Easy to use interface. If used smartly, adds a power of automatization to your workflow.
Since it's based on API's it may be hard to use. Also, it oftentimes doesn't have features, that the product's API already supports
Routine task automation. Mainly transferring data from one system, like Freshdesk, into another, like Slack, or Google sheets.
Integromat is the most flexible workflow automation tool we've tried. Once you learn how to use the workflow builder, the tool is nearly limitless in what you can build with it. In addition, the execution logs and error handling give us the confidence we need to build critical integrations in Integromat.
Currently no billing option to automatically top up your credits if you run out. They do send warning emails, but we have been caught flat-footed a couple times, leading to service outages.
We've used Integromat for everything from simple static site generation, to PDF generation, to integrating our CRM with Google Drive and communications systems, to cron jobs that update partner systems on a schedule. Because Integromat has robust queuing, error handling, etc. it's dramatically faster to test new integrations in Integromat vs. building from scratch.
It supports integration with so many services, and the variety of what actions to perform is very helpful.
It would be nice if there were a few more types of triggers and search criteria. Currently, I sometimes use it in combination with Zapier.
By eliminating the work that had to be done manually on a regular basis, the actual man-hours and stress have been reduced.
We can connect our favorite tools together and automate our workflows to avoid manual entry.
Nothing we'd dislike, we are satisfied with Integromat.
Connecting our favorite tools together so we can pass information from one tool to another and get notifications for certain actions based on the trigger.
I like Integromat's visually responsive, tree-style interface that lets you know where you are in a workflow and all the data each operation yielded.
A couple of things. 1. You cannot clone scenarios. If you have a scenario that works well, but you need another with a slight variation, you will have to create it again from scratch. 2. At present, you're unable to replay a scenario or operation without having to trigger it again from the start. This can be incredibly annoying if the failed process is the last in a long chain of functions.
Integromat allows us to automate multiple workflows in our business processes and gives us the flexibility to test and create new workflows without interrupting currently deployed systems.
This program helps me to build autonomous processes and, unlike comparable programs, if properly programmed, automation can still remain within the free package, it does not restrict me to restricted capabilities. Your customer service is just incredible, if you get lost. The intuitive user interface adds a lot to automatic situations, and encourages a beginner to do useful automation without code expertise. I see the world and Integromat opened my eyes and facilitated my life.
There is a certain learning curve, which does not clarify all choices well. Automation schedules are not made easy by competing providers, so it is a little difficult to get started. Maybe a more user-friendly handbook for custom https or Oauth2 requests might be given, but it's all that sophisticated that the bulk of non-coding users would find it too difficult to manage even manuals in some modules.
It reducing my workflow from thirty minutes to two minutes, which was wonderful. I solved my post-acquisition workflow. That day, I saw a tremendous opportunity for the job routines of everyday people on this site. Save Google Drive documents from an e-mail, monitor file formation, quick and simple documentation, e-mail transfer text to the channel of Telegram, needless text filter, etc.
The two best features of Integromat are the sheer volume of apps which you can connect together. This has been a game changer for our company, being able to connect all the main apps we use on a day to day basis, which are integral for running the business. The fact we can create an array of automation's has taken so much of the manual process away. I am also a big fan of the variety of automated tasks you can set up between apps. We've been able to run search and remove automation's which in the past we needed a third party to create a work around which we had no control over. Integromat has allowed us to control everything ourselves.
There is one issue that has occurred on a handful of occasions which is when an automation runs and then errors. This prevents the task from finishing and means we have to manually go in to the software and check why this error occurred. On at least half of the times this has happened there has been no reason for it. We've ran the automation again manually and no error has occurred. This is very minor though as we have automation's running every day and for it to only happen a handful of times is a good strike rate in my opinion. I would also say that you need to spend time learning the software and have a reasonable period of testing in order to see the benefits.
The ability to be able to set up automated tasks that run outside of business hours has been a massive problem which we've solved. Another huge benefit of choosing Integromat is the lack on manual labour involved in our day to day tasks now - triggering emails, deleting, moving and archiving information from different apps. Once you've set up an automation and can see the benefits, you'll be continuously looking for ways to set up more. Integromat also has a very helpful support section which will give you a nudge in the right direction should you struggle working out how to set up certain tasks/automations.
I like Integromat because it gives me more fine-grained control over my automations than Zapier. I also like the visual interface, it's helpful for me personally the way I process information.
There is a learning curve -- but, even though i have no coding background, I have found I am able to teach myself most things, and then the support is very helpful - they made me a screencap video showing me how to do exactly the thing i needed.
We use it to implement automation with Airtable. Airtable would not be a useful tool at all without it.
I like this system because it has a very intuitive and versatile design that allows me to use it in a simple way, even after receiving the assistance of the customer service team for the configuration of this program, I liked to see how many processes were automated, leaving to more than one overwhelmed, in this way I have been able to make the most of my time and that of my staff.
At first I did not like this system because I felt confused with so many functions and at times I was about to ask for a refund, but thank God this did not happen since the customer service team gave us all the help in a timely and professional manner.
Thanks to this system has facilitated the process of sharing information between work teams, as well as facilitates the process of exporting files in various languages, no doubt this is very good because it saves us from having to buy file converters or having to expose ourselves to use online converters that can leave traces on the web of our important documents. With this software we have the facility to integrate it with numerous applications in order to have all the information at hand and very complete, we can also review the automated management in order to evaluate from the errors that the system can throw like the performance of the same.
Flexibility and price. It has more advanced features like Routing, triggering on changed records (Airtable in our case) and others.
Might be a bit overwhelming compared to Zapier or IFTTT, especially for non-techies, but they have good documentation
Things like sending a reminder via email for records from Airtable with a due date. This is not really possible with Zapier (only once).
A great tool to create integrations between apps. Loads of functionality and new apps are being added daily. A Zapier killer due to the attractive subscription levels.
There is a steep learning curve on some functionality (aggregators and integrators) and the help could be more comprehensive. It would be great if we could share developed scenarios with other users.
Replacing paid integrations with our own solutions for clients
Integromat is a great app that allows me to persolinize my streams with lots of options.
Some apps still not in Integromat. Like MySQL Trigger, Docusign.
The entire message flow for the client is integrated through Integromat.
Flows are visual, they can be split and aggregated, and all basic text/number manipulation is done 'inline' and not as another step! I used a bunch of tools like this one, and the usability here is much better.
A large number of scenarios can start to become hard to manage. Some version control and review processes can be helpful.
Automating integrations between different platforms without making it a full-on Dev project.
You can build any flow you want/need in a very easy way. Even non technical members can create their own pipes with a basic learning. Many integrations are available and you can make curl, so you can do (almost) everything you want.
Filter conditions are not completely flexible. You need to input workarounds with more conditions than desired.
The main initial reason was to connect Segment and Pipedrive, which are not integrated between them. Then, in a enviroment with many tools, Integromat helps to glue them, adding value at the same time
It offers a good integration designer, with conditional logic, loops and other tools that you won't fine on other services.
Think the support is a little off yet... Had a problem with one of the connectors months ago and got no solution. Had to use HTTP request instead.
Integrating about 20 SaaS services to optimize workflows and reduce tedious repetition.
That i can set up connections between different tools and services in a matter of minutes.
If you use it heavily it can get a bit messy in the overview.
Quick and continuing data transfer between differen web-services
Beautiful UI on node / HUGE amount of functionality with no real competitors - fills the gap between IFTTT/Zapier and Programmatic web api
ok documentation but need more....that will come in town as usage increases
We are using it to help automate our processes and greatly increase efficiency of tasks.
