Datapeople Reviews & Product Details

Specific and actionable guidance on how to improve the clarity, concision and approachability of your job description, and cut out corporate jargon-speak. It's like Grammarly for job descriptions.

Datapeople doesn't like ambiguity e.g. certain qualifications or experience being 'preferred' rather than required. Having this sort of thing flagged as a problem can get minorly annoying when you do actually have good reason for your choice of words...but overall not a big deal.

Ensuring we don't miss out on great candidates by using unapproachable or exclusive language in job descriptions.

That I could edit everything and also I can add someone to the document

I actualy don't know what you could upgrade.

The most important thing is option to share job description with someone. We could work together !

Not provided

Not provided

Not provided

It's easy to easy, it's like someone is taking you by the hand to a better way of writing.

Sometimes there are things i want to say but the system wants me to delete it

How to better communicate my ideas and reach everyone

I like the suggestions that I get in real-time and the explanations of why specific expressions are not going to catch the eye or sound attractive to a potential candidate.

Once I select a template from the list, I can't undo the changes in the ATS. It was a bit annoying to continuously try to make changes in the ATS, then in the Datapeople template and lose much time.

- Makes the job posting sound more attractive not only to diverse talent but to any candidates. Therefore, an increased number of applications. - Reduces the ambiguity in how the job posting sounds - attracts more applications that fit the job requirements better.

I like DataPeople as it's easy to enable extensions into your systems, to avoid duplication but also remind you to use it.

Sometimes certain language is unavoidble - such as listing good written communication skills for role in copywritting and there's little way to work around that.

Datapeople encourages me to observe language commonly used, and understand its external connotatons and meanings I like that it offers some alternatives to find less gendered language in these instances

I like the layout and intuitiveness of the platform. It's very easy to pop up a job ad and I like the fact that you can lock certain static elements that you want in all job ads.

Haven't come across anything yet in the 4 months that I have been using it.Would be great to get recommendations of how to improve inclusivity for instances where the score is <80

Diversity rating consistency. It gives me a good indicator of how good my job ad is before posting. It also makes me consciously think about my language more and makes my wording more intentional.

To write attractive job postings for my positions.

Sometimes I have to invert time to write the post correctly.

They are giving us tutorials to learn how to use it.

Data-people provides very thoughtful insights - the feedback it provides is valuable in supporting a recruiter's recommendations to hiring managers and truly encourages change in what's published.

For my company specifically, it can be hard to fit everything necessary into a job positing while still getting a "good" score. The amount of COMPANY required content leaves very little room for the JOB specific necessary content.

Datapeople is helping to reduce wordiness and detracting language in job descriptions. It's data-driven "advice" is encouraging our hiring teams to make changes that they weren't interested in making prior, despite the advice of the recruiting team.

the suggested amendments makes it easy to quickly get jobs much more inclusive without the hiring manager having to take too much effort or time

'one size fits all' approach. sometimes for some specific ads the wording can't be changed as suggested as it then wouldn't make sense

encouraging more diverse applicants with the inclusive wording