Prismic Reviews & Product Details

Slices, I think this feature of slices is very adaptable and customisable. Boost the editorial as well as developers' experience

Few points: 1. Validations are not present within CMS, so developers need to have lots of additional checks while building websites or apps. 2. Custom plugins, I would love Prismic more, if they allow me to build custom plugins which can be used within CMS

We wanted to have a quick to build and manage CMS for our newsletters and Prismic meets all our requirements

Their interface is super easy. Managing content has never been easier! They offer a generous free tier. As a developer I really love their "slice machine". It's very powerful and adds value to my developer workflow.

While you have plenty of field options to choose from when creating content, some more advanced field options like a dropdown with separate display value vs. code value could help create better code.

Providing an easy way to add content or keep content updated is very easy. Because this is a headless CMS you can use it on any channel you like, be it web, mobile or something else...

Prismic has very well written documentation that covers the most popular JS frameworks. Their community forum is also a great place to go for help if you get stuck. I also really like the well thought out approach to multilingual support and the way documents are handled when switching language. Slice machine is also a brilliant tool.

Slight delay in some tools being updated to work with the latest version of some frameworks. The documentation could do with more examples.

Prismic helps me offer clients an elegant solution to website/page building. It is without the best solution I've seen that clients pickup very quickly with minimal assistance.

Managing the content structure and receiving it from the cloud, good UI to view the contents and structures

Not as good editor experience as in contentful. Improper asset management and filtering of the contents

Managing the content on the cloud provides marketing team the required flexibility to work on

Fast learning curve for Content managers as well as developers. Very easy to integrate into various tech stacks. Most affordable Headless CMS out there.

It should be easier to contact customer support. More integrations of third-party providers and faster bug fixes.

Content managment

The flexibility of distributing multiple types of content across our website stack, we have many dynamic areas of our website powered by logic through Prismic. We couldn't of done what we needed to do without Prismic's feature set.

I think the documents editor could be easier to use and pickup by non-technical people.

The CMS was easy to integrate and manage ongoing, we wanted to offload the reliance of supporting a CMS and Prismic fit the job wonderfully. We needed to scale the number of pages we had quickly across multiple languages, being able to import and export documents so that we could automate the process saved many many hours.

The way you can organize and create pages of content.

Sometimes it takes to long to update and appear on the website.

Content organization and page creation. Also website management.

I recently built my first prismic.io project for a client - it was easy to learn and set up. My client felt that it was easy to use Prismic's interface. I compared Prismic to a few other competitors and it seemed to have the best combination of features.

Unfortunately, I am getting billed for multiple locales, but I only have one locale. I've reached out to Prismic support but have yet to hear back.

My client's project is best suited for a headless application, but we needed a CMS.

I've been a near-daily user of Prismic since ~2016 for content management on client and internal websites. The ability to build pages from "slices" is a great way of being able to provide a page-builder experience for fully custom components. The flexibility is matched by the speed and ease of implementation through the Slice Machine tool, which integrates into modern development workflows easily. Recently the team has begun to release improvements to the writer experience that look likely to bring that editor experience up to the same level of excellence as the developer experience. All in all a solid option for managing content on static sites.

Content organisation and findability can be a challenge as all entries appear in a single list, there are options for filtering which are helpful but it still presents a challenge for contributors. Updates to the writer/contributor experience have felt slow while the company has been focussed on their (excellent) developer experience, this can make internal advocacy and support for the platform a challenge. There is also no native option for adding validation to fields, while I understand the team's rationale I think the lack of those guard rails is a barrier to adoption by content teams.

Prismic enables us to open up content management to the wider team of writers and editors, with an intuitive page-builder-like experience, on our static sites.

We use Prismic as a headless CMS, connecting to a Java-based application. The API supports all our use cases, and works pretty well. The user interface serves our needs to create content.

The Java SDK hasn't seen an update in quite a while. Bulk editing would be a nice feature to have.

We use Prismic to create and maintain content about our training compendium.